The research is to be carried out over one term in two different educational institutes from the post graduate level. Five different sections will be studied along with five different educational leaders. For Canadian institutions, the universities, U OF T, Ryerson, York, and George Brown College are categorized to be studied. Upon waiting on approval and confirmation of the institute, one of these organizations will be picked to study. For Chinese institutions, the Jiangsu University is selected to carry out the case study. Approximately 50 to 100 students will be studied to gain correct results for the case study.
There should be several separate case studies. The case study should be segmented in accordance with the segments of the population to be surveyed. The first should target the people within one of the two education systems. Thus, meaning people working in the field of education. This will include anyone and everyone in a position of authority and responsibility with in the education system. The people will provide valuable insight in to the internal workings of the system. These people who include policy makers, teachers, administrators, and even educational psychologists are the best eligible to answer questions and provide us with an understanding on the working of the systems. In addition to the questionnaires these people should also be interviewer for these people are the most highly qualified to answer questions related to education. What are hallmarks, how it is important, what are the ways in which transformational leadership is different in the two nations, in which ways it is alike. The interviews should be objective yet exhaustive. They should be designed to elicit responses on all aspects of the classrooms in China and in Canada. The professional who answer these questions from both education systems will perhaps offer us the most information of any other
这项研究是在两个不同的研究生水平的教育机构进行超过一届任期之内实现上述目标。五个不同的部分进行研究，有五个不同的教育领导者。加拿大的机构，大学，U，T，瑞尔森，纽约，乔治·布朗学院的分类进行研究。在等待该机构的批准和确认，这些组织将被拾起来研究。对于中国的机构，江苏大学选择的情况下进行研究。大约有50至100名学生将研究的案例研究，以获得正确的结果。
应该有几个不同的案例研究。应该分段段的人口进行调查的案例研究。首先应该针对人的两个教育系统内。因此，这意味着人们在教育领域的工作。这将包括任何人，每个人都在教育系统的权力和责任的位置。系统的内部工作的人提供有价值的见解。这些人包括政策制定者，教师，行政人员，甚至教育心理学家的资格是最好的回答问题，并为我们提供了一个了解系统的工作。除了问卷，这些人也应该是面试者，这些人是最有资格回答有关教育的问题。有什么特点，它是重要的，什么是变革型领导的方法是不同的两个国家，在哪些方面，它是相同的。应该是客观的，但详尽的采访。他们的教室在中国和加拿大的各个方面的设计应引起的反应。回答这些问题，来自教育系统的专业人士也许会为我们提供任何其他信息
