英国论文不会写：同性婚姻
婚姻的分化开始后听到同性婚姻是婚姻制度,应该是男人和女人。本法已在美国法典。近年来通过年代联邦法律。在某种程度上,这种观点存在分歧,因为这是最弱的论点。人相信,没有人有权编纂婚姻这个词。这不是关于一些银行家决定的人,他将自己的钱的银行。争论这个论点可以的原因;如果直人仍然没有令人信服的理由来否认同性婚姻之后,他们不应该否认。原因提出了同性恋不是模糊的,不能被他们宣布。美国的基本人权理想的解释,你不能否认其他个体的权利,除非你有一个令人信服的理由。现在反对同性婚姻的另一个论点是关于生育和如何在同性婚姻是不可能的。这个观点被接受在某种程度上,但这不是一个令人信服的理由。许多直人在他们的婚姻问题,因为有些人不肥沃的和无能。这些人怎么样?他们应该撤回他们的结婚戒指只是因为他们不能生育?同样适用于同性恋夫妇,他们被允许有孩子被捐助者的帮助,这也是目前异性婚姻。人们为同性恋权利工作相信同性婚姻应该合法化这个词,理所当然的。这种说法在某种程度上是不被接受的因为直人认为同性婚姻不应该被合法化。这样的概念是在构建和从一个文明转移到另一个。如果这样的宪法传递比异性恋者的情绪将会影响和其他人争论他们的权利,不会被社会所接受的。
英国论文不会写：同性婚姻
另一方面人们在支持同性恋权利相信根据公民自由权利,表明对追求幸福的权利。如果政府遵循这条规则那么同性婚姻应该合法化。没有人有权利决定个人的选择和谁娶了谁。同性恋应该得到的权利,提高他们的家庭像直人伴侣没有讽刺和审查(同性恋婚姻被上诉法院拒绝在美国中西部)。提出了对同性婚姻的另一个论点是关于孩子成长的最佳环境。不支持这个论点在某种程度上,因为研究表明,孩子在《卫报》同样喜欢同性恋给结果直接在配偶抚养的孩子。心理学家认为,孩子们只关心爱和情感来自他们的父母,而不是性别(Halpouch)。
英国论文不会写：同性婚姻
The point of differentiation that starts after hearing the word gay marriages is about the institution of marriage that is supposed to be with a man and woman. This law has been codified in the U.S federal law that is passed in recent times. To an extent disagreement with this argument is present because this is the weakest argument. People believe that no one has the right to codify the term marriage. This is not about some banker who is deciding about the people, who will own the money of his bank. Disagreement about this argument can be the reason; if straight people still have no compelling reason to deny the gay marriages then they should not deny it. Reasons presented by gay people are not nebulous and cannot be declared by them. The basic ideal human rights of the United States explain that you cannot deny the rights of other individuals unless you have a compelling reason. Another argument present against the gay marriages is about procreation and how it is impossible in gay marriages. This argument is accepted to some extent but this is not a compelling reasons. Many straight people have issues in their marriage because some are unfertile and impotent. What about these people? Should they withdraw their wedding rings just because they cannot procreate? Same goes for the gay couples, they are allowed to have children by the help of donors and this is also present with straight couples. People working for gay rights believe that gay marriages should be given the term legalized and merited. This argument is not accepted to an extent because straight people believe that gay marriages should not be legalized. Concepts like these are in build and are transferred from one civilization to another. If such constitutions are passed than the sentiments of straight people will be impacted and other people will argue about their rights that will not be accepted by the society.
英国论文不会写：同性婚姻
On the other hand people talking in favor of gay rights believe that according to the civil liberties rights that suggest about the pursuit of happiness. If the government follows this rule then gay marriages should be legalized. No one has the right to decide about the choice of an individual and who marries who. Gays should be given the rights to raise their families like straight couples without sarcasm and scrutiny (Gay Marriage Right Rejected by Appeals Court in U.S. Midwest). Another argument presented over gay marriages is about the optimum environment in which children are raised. This argument is not supported to an extent because studies suggest that children raised under the guardian like gays give results same like the children raised under straight couples. Psychologists believe that children are only concerned about the love and affection drawn from their parents and not the gender (Halpouch).
