英国东伦敦大学论文代写：军事学
拉塞尔报道了来自阿尔玛河的战斗，他写了一本书，内容是从一名俄罗斯士兵的尸体中获取的。这个故事写的是一封信，它支持英国军队，注意到战地外科医生的“人道野蛮”，这份报告还指出，在战斗中受伤的部队缺乏救护车照顾(帕尔默，1987年)。同样，罗素也提到了塞瓦斯托波尔的包围，在这一过程中，著名的表达“细红线”是在提到英国士兵时创造的。
英国东伦敦大学论文代写：军事学
罗素所提出的问题至今仍困扰着战地记者和政府。还需要指出的是，克里米亚战争不是罗素的故事，而是他的专栏的混合，以及其他在场的人，包括英国军官、俄罗斯王子和法国将军们的作品。虽然这些记者不是历史学家，但罗素投出的克里米亚战争的报道却有一个长长的影子。结论:威廉·霍华德·拉塞尔从克瑞米战争中被认为是他的遗产，他第一次成功地将战争的现实带给远离战场的读者。由于拉塞尔的派遣，远离战场和后方的距离明显减少。
英国东伦敦大学论文代写：军事学
Russell reported the battle from the Alma River and he wrote regarding a book that was seized from the corpse of a Russian soldier. This story was written as a letter and it supported the British troops by paying attention to the “humane barbarity” of the battlefield surgeons and this report also pointed towards the lack of ambulance care for the troops that were wounded in the battle (Palmer, 1987). Similarly, Russell also covered the Siege of Sevastopol in which the famous expression “thin red line” was coined while mentioning to the British soldiers (Schroeder, 1972).
英国东伦敦大学论文代写：军事学
The issues that were raised by Russell haunt the war correspondents and the governments even today. It also needs to be noted that The Crimean War was not the story of Russell but it was a blend of his columns as well as the ones written by others who were also present on the scene including English officers, Russian princes and French generals. Although the journalists are not historians but still the reports of Crimea war sent by Russell cast a long shadow.Conclusion: The dispatches of William Howard Russel from the Cremian war are considered as his legacy and he was successful for the first time in bringing the realities of war to the readers who were far away from the battlefield. As a result of the dispatches of Russell, the distance between the far away battle fields and the home front was reduced significantly.
