英国梅铎大学论文怎么写:同性婚姻
还支持这个论点的其他参数,如谁有权决定个人的权利的社会。很明显,人们喜欢罪犯,猥亵儿童,被定罪的人、谋杀等都允许将他们的生活自由的社会。他们被允许生育和家庭,即使他们不喜欢社会的其他成员,因为他们的活动和犯罪。为什么这种哲学可以申请同性恋夫妇,他们为什么不能得到平等权利与其他社会成员。再次批评同性恋婚姻有令人信服的理由不接受同性婚姻。假设情况下,人们观察世界的每一个人睡在对面。同性恋者成为异性恋和直人成为同性恋。可能的问题,新的同性恋人们争取他们的权利吗?这个论点提出了许多同性恋者,但这一观点弱在某种程度上,因为这种情况下是不可能的。生活在一个国家没有方向,相信将土地变成一个混乱的情况。
英国梅铎大学论文怎么写:同性婚姻
美国出平等权利的土地一但这个场景永远不能成为一个有效的和令人信服的理由让同性婚姻。成为平等的基础上的性取向在一定程度上是有效的,因为人们认为,少数民族像西班牙人、印度人、中国人,墨西哥人,非洲人等都应得到平等的权利。这些少数民族也是社会的一部分,必须平等对待。这个论点很有说服力,表明基于性取向平等。参数如同性婚姻是不朽的和恐吓婚姻制度的反对同性恋婚姻。这个论点是同意某种程度上因为婚姻的宪法及其机构讨论圣经,人们应该遵循。宗教就像佛教接受同性恋关系和庆祝这一关系的幸福。这里的论点不是关于基督教的宗教,而是追求的概念作为一个有效的机构法律造成的。另一方面反对这一概念表明,圣经没有站在美国的立法。宗教自由意味着权利的自由。如果人们相信宗教自由,他们需要接受这样的事实,有言论自由和宗教自由的权利。另一个角度论证解释说,接受同性婚姻将打开大门鸡奸法。根据许多批评家接受同性婚姻的同性恋者依法对鸡奸法将打开大门。这将成为法院很难让每对夫妻结婚,然后给他们有性关系的许可。这个观点被接受在某种程度上因为接受这样的法律将不仅是困难的对于同性恋群体,直人伴侣也将是一个挑战。在很多州国家的盛行和同性恋是性侵犯者,被称为最高法院(一个有力的论点对同性婚姻)。
英国梅铎大学论文怎么写:同性婚姻
This argument is also supported by other arguments like who has the right to decide about the rights of individuals in the society. It is evident that people like criminals, child molesters, convicted individuals, murders etc. are allowed to spend their life freely in the society. They are allowed to procreate and have families even though they are not liked by the fellow members of the society because of their activities and crimes. So why can this philosophy apply for gay couples, why can’t they be given equal rights like other members of the society. Once again critics of gay marriages have compelling reason for not accepting gay marriages. Assuming a situation in which people are observing a world that is opposite from the one every one slept in. Gay people became straight and straight people became gay.The question arises that is it possible that the new gay people will struggle for their rights? This argument is presented by many gays but this argument is weak to an extent because such a situation is not possible. Living in a state with no directions and believes would land into a chaotic situation all over.
英国梅铎大学论文怎么写:同性婚姻
America is the land that gives equal rights to ever one but this scenario can never become a valid and compelling reason for allowing gay marriages in the country. Becoming equal on the base of sexual orientation is valid to an extent because people argue that minorities like Hispanics, Indians, Chinese, Mexicans, and Africans etc. should be given equal rights. These minorities are also a part of the society and must be treated equally. This argument is compelling that suggests about the equality based on sexual orientation. Arguments like gay marriages are immortal and scare the institution of marriage are given against gay marriages in the country. This argument is agreed to an extent because the constitution of marriage and its institution is discussed in Bible and people should follow that. Religions like Buddhism accept gay relations and celebrate the happiness of this relationship. The argument here is not about the religion but about pursuing the concepts of Christianity as a valid institution of law making. On the other hand arguments against this concept suggest that Bible has no standing in law making of America. Freedom of the religion suggests the freedom of right also. If people believe in religious freedom they need to accept the fact that freedom of the religion comes with freedom of expression and rights. Another point of argument explains that the acceptance of gay marriages will open gates for sodomy laws. According to many critics of gay marriages the acceptance of gays according to the law will open gates for sodomy laws. This will become hard for the court to allow every couple for getting married and then grant them the permission for having sexual relations. This argument is accepted to an extent because the acceptance of such law will not only be difficult for the gay community but will be challenging for the straight couples also. In many states of the country this law prevails and gays are termed as sexual offenders and are convicted by the court (A strong argument about gay marriage).
