英国大学论文代写：功利主义对人的影响
在功利主义看来，一个人的行为是对是错取决于行为对人的影响。它是一种伦理哲学，把社会上大多数人的幸福放在第一位。更大的好处对大多数人的影响是引导一个人的行为(Moore, 2014)。这样做的行为在道德上是好的，当一个行为不能保证对大多数人都有更大的好处时，那么它可能在道德上是错误的。同行评议并不是诚实的复苏，但更多的是发现对同事的抱怨，员工不得不这样做，即使他们不想这样做。虽然这提高了他们在公司的地位，但这违背了功利主义和义务论。
英国大学论文代写：功利主义对人的影响
现在在功利主义的案例中，就像安然公司的财务人员的绩效评估一样，它被打破了。员工们并不担心他们大多数人有什么好东西，他们只担心自己。如果他们能保住工作，他们就会选择低估自己的同伴。对彼此的适当评价可能会导致一种伦理评价体系。然而，由于员工已经陷入了公司的伦理问题体系，这也使得员工很难以一种伦理的方式来处理这个问题(Silverstein, 2013)。
英国大学论文代写：功利主义对人的影响
Now per utilitarianism, actions of a person are right or wrong based on the effects the action has on people. It is an ethical philosophy where the happiness of the greatest number of people in society will be considered first. The effect of greater good on the greatest number of people was to guide the action of a person (Moore, 2014). An action that does this will be morally good and when an action does not ensure greater good to the greatest number of people, then it can be morally wrong. The peer review was not honest revives, but was more of finding complaints about co-workers and employees had to do it even when they did not want to. While this enhanced their own positions in the company, this goes against both utilitarianism and deontology.
英国大学论文代写：功利主义对人的影响
Now in the case of utilitarianism, as applied in the performance appraisals of the financial workers in Enron, it is breached. The employees did not worry about most them having something good, and they were only worried about themselves. They made choice to under evaluate their peers if they could keep their jobs. Proper evaluation of each other could have led to an ethical appraisal system. However, since the employees were already caught up in a system of ethical issues in the company, it also made it difficult for the employees to approach the issue in an ethical way (Silverstein, 2013).
