英国代写毕业论文：有关言论文自由的辩论分析
然而，关于绝对言论自由的辩论一直存在，而且近年来势头越来越大，因为互联网和社交媒体呈指数级增长，赋予了人们表达观点和广泛传播观点的权力。对言论自由最有力的支持来自自由主义理论，该理论强调个人及其在政治决策中的作用的自由。在所有后来的理论家中，约翰·罗尔斯的正义理论最接近于定义言论自由和审查制度之间的紧张关系，“接受现代性的道德多样性作为一个最终事实，并寻求构建正义原则，允许对立的道德传统和平共存”(Steel, 2013)。
英国代写毕业论文：有关言论文自由的辩论分析
正是在这种自由主义的传统中，人们提出了宽容的理念和围绕宽容的理论，这些理念和理论认为，在一个自由社会中，即便是那些可能与主流观点相悖的观点和观点也应该得到允许。互联网用户往往最终会对他人的文化、宗教、民族主义以及与之相关的情绪进行宽容限度的测试。这就产生了“仇恨言论”这一术语，其中一个群体自由地发布关于另一个群体的不敏感信息，从而制造和延续仇恨。
政府和司法机构以反仇恨法作出回应，惩罚和惩罚发表仇恨言论的肇事者。然而，这种方法在控制这种情况或向人们灌输相互尊重对方的种族、文化和宗教方面的效果如何?当然，反社会活动应该被限制，但限制所有的言论不是一个解决方案。
英国代写毕业论文：有关言论文自由的辩论分析
However, the debate around absolute freedom of speech has always been there and has been gaining momentum in the recent years, what with the exponential growth of internet and social media that has given the power to people to express their views and proliferate their views far and wide. The strongest support for freedom of speech emanates from the theory of liberalism that emphasizes on freedom of individuals and their agency in political decision making. Of all the later theorists, John Rawls’s Theory of Justice comes closest to defining the tension between free speech and censorship, “accepts the moral diversity of modernity as an ultimate fact and seeks to construct principles of justice which permit rival moral traditions to co-exist in peace” (Steel, 2013).
英国代写毕业论文：有关言论文自由的辩论分析
It is in this liberal tradition that idea of tolerance and theories around it were posited, which said that even those views and opinions that might go against the majority view should be permitted in a free society. The internet users often end up testing the other people’s threshold of tolerance with respect to their cultural, religion, nationalism, and sentiments revolving around those. This has given rise to the term “hate speech” where one group takes the liberty to post insensitive messages about another, thereby inflicting and perpetuating hate.
The government and judiciary responded with anti-hate laws which penalize and punish perpetrators of hate speech. However, how far is this method effective in controlling such instances or inculcating in people a mutual respect for each other’s ethnicity, culture, and religion? Of course the anti-social activities should be curtailed but restricting all speech is not a solution.
