1 Being a public company has its advantages and disadvantages. On the one hand, investors who hold stock get liquidity. However, there are also tremendous regulatory, administrative, financial reporting and corporate governance bylaws to comply with. These activities can shift management’s focus away from operating and growing a company and toward compliance with and adherence to government regulations.
It has to comply the requirement of SOX Act, 2002 basically of section 404, & 302 and of course of penal provisions also.
Thus if the existing members of the company wants to take the benefit and bear the disadvantageous as discussed above then it can go to raise the fund through the public.
As mentioned at the last of the Question that it wants to have the full control over the Company and minimum Scrutiny then it should not go for it as in case of public company it requires transparency which is not in favor of the existing members however if it want to get the benefit of the advantageous and may bear the disadvantageous as discussed it may go for the same.
作为一个上市公司都有它的优点和缺点。一方面，投资者持有股票的流动性。不过，也有巨大的监管，行政，财务报告和遵守的公司治理规章制度。这些活动可以改变管理的重点从经营和不断增长的公司，向符合和遵守政府法规。
它的萨班斯法案，基本上是2002年的第404及302，当然刑法规定也符合要求。
因此，如果该公司希望现有成员的利益和承担不利的，如上面所讨论的，那么它可以通过公开募集资金。
正如前面提到的最后一个问题，它想的完全控制权的公司和最小的审查，那么它不应该去的情况下，它的上市公司，它需要透明度，是不利于现有成员，但是，如果它想要得到的利益有利的和可能承担的不利的讨论，可以去相同。
