新西兰惠灵顿论文怎么写：剽窃
这意味着剽窃的CAE州不同于我们所学的关于剽窃。剽窃对写作是不被认为是基于上下文。只要使用的文本行或部分在我们的作品或写作,据说是剽窃,除非或直到它引用。上下文无关紧要,也不可能创建的重组,作者必须引用。罗兰·巴特讨论所谓的作者的死亡,然而在我们的作品中作者引用非常活跃。混音和重组提出了积极和消极的方面。在积极的背景下,复合因素被定义为创造价值的东西给一个非常小的预算或价值,没有正式的培训资源。一个人采访表示,尽管电影学校创建培训资源,基本值实际上可能是由内在的人。
新西兰惠灵顿论文怎么写：剽窃
“储蓄的点是什么语言当不再有什么要说的?“CAE和电影强调这一点。夸张的分析和观点上剽窃,代表可以说,没有使用的创建时,它不能共享或评论或混音。艺术为了艺术,意味着,你可以看看图片,欣赏它,读书和思考,但什么是如果一个人不能做任何事情。某人想欣赏别人的音乐,使它或使用一些诗句的混音一本书。有文本和分文本作品应该允许被使用,只有这样,目的是创建、其他文化与精英仍被拘留,就因为这一原因剽窃重组和技术民主化作为一种工具来解放艺术必须都被鼓励。
新西兰惠灵顿论文怎么写：剽窃
This meaning of plagiarism as CAE states it is different from what we have been taught about plagiarism. Plagiarism with respect to writing is not considered based on context. As long as a line or section of text is used as such in our works or writing, it is said to be plagiarism, unless or until it is referenced well. The context does not matter, nor does the recombinant that it might be created in; the author has to be referenced. Roland Barthes discusses what is called the death of the author; however in our writings the author is very much alive in our referencing. The remix and recombinants are presented in both positive and negative ways. In the positive context, the recombination factor has been defined as something that creates value given a very small budget or value with no formal training for the resources. A person interviewed stated that although film schools and more create trained resources, the basic value might actually be developed from the inner person.
新西兰惠灵顿论文怎么写：剽窃
“What is the point of saving language when there is no longer anything to say?” Both CAE and the movie highlight this point. In the analysis of the exaggerations and the viewpoints on plagiarism that both represent it can be said that there is no use of having a creation when it can’t be shared or critiqued or remixed. Art for art sake, would mean, one can look at a picture and admire it, read a book and think about, but what is the use if one cannot do anything with it. A person might want to appreciate someone’s music by making a remix of it or by using some verses in a book. There are ways in which textual and non-textual creations should be allowed to be used, only then purpose is created, else culture would still be detained with the elites, and for this very reason plagiarism as recombinants and technological democratization as a tool to liberate art must both be encouraged.
