新西兰代写assignment:告密者行为
尽管明显的问题的告密者的脸,他们选择对公司说。的原因有些人决定对公司的报告,他们认为他们是公司的最佳利益行事(Painter-Morland & Bos,2011)。告密者通常使用公司提供的渠道私下解决这个问题,确保他们所做的正当程序,以解决友好的解决方案(附近等,2011)。在很多情况下,管理的建议选择忽略告密者或可能强迫他们遵守错误的行为(Vinten,1994)。公司选择参与到违法行为后事先警告的告密者。许多商业组织声称让他们的员工(施瓦兹,2000),然而一些权利伦理保护公司仍否认。在这样的情况下,告密者将别无选择,只能报告非法活动为了拯救受害者。如果告密者预测严重危害对某些人而言,他们别无选择,只能站出来反对组织(费舍尔等人,1999)。
新西兰代写assignment:告密者行为
告密者也获得足够的证据对该公司之前对该公司向前发展。证据应以这样一种方式,控方必须能够表明当事人(博克,1980)。总有一个道德困境参与这个过程,因为它是一个对公司忠诚的问题和在该公司的最佳利益(Duska,1997),甚至专家正在努力破译与它相关的伦理困境(鲍伊,1982)。想的人站出来犹豫开始时由于这些因素。有些人决定报告对公司的行为无论如何服务于更大的利益(波等,2004)。泄密的行为将帮助很多实体;不得为有些人挺身而出,他们的利益。告密者有实质性的证据通常当他们决定报告公司的违规行为。
新西兰代写assignment:告密者行为
In spite of the obvious issues the whistleblowers face, they choose to speak against the companies. The reasons some people decide to report against the company are that they believe they are acting in the best interests of the company (Painter-Morland & Bos, 2011). The whistleblowers usually use all the avenues provided by the company to resolve this issue privately and make sure they have done the due process in order to resolve the solution amicably (Near et al, 2011). In many of these cases the management chooses to ignore the advices of the whistleblower or might coerce them to comply with the wrong deeds (Vinten, 1994). The companies choose to involve themselves in illegal acts after prior warnings by the whistleblower. Many business organizations claim to empower their employee (Schwartz, 2000), however some rights for ethics protection of the company is still denied to them. In such instance, the whistle-blower will have no choice but to report the illegal activities in order to save the victims. If the whistleblower foresees grave endangerments to some people, they have no choice but to come forward against the organizations (Fisher et al, 1999).
新西兰代写assignment:告密者行为
The whistleblowers also garner enough evidence about the company before coming forward against the company. The evidence should be in such a way that the prosecution must be able to implicate the parties (Bok, 1980). There is always an ethical dilemma involved in this process as it is a question of loyalty to company versus working in the best interests of the company (Duska, 1997), even the experts are trying to decipher the ethical dilemma associated with it (Bowie, 1982). The people who want to come forward hesitate at the beginning owing to these factors. Some people decide to report about the actions of the company anyway to serve the greater good (Beauchamp et al, 2004). The act of whistle-blowing will aid a lot of entities; it may not serve the individuals who are coming forward and their interests. The whistle blowers have substantial proof usually when they decide to report about the company’s wrongdoings.
