生成的组织图解释了希尔顿悉尼事件操作过程的启发式。总经理控制着这个部门。这个过程的确切启发式是从研究中收集的。发现公司的部门包括财务部、家政、保安、工程经理等服务业、销售部、餐饮部以及独立的人力资源部。在这一过程中收集了责任的具体划分和分配。回顾过去，我们进行了两种研究，一种是对首席运营官的访谈，另一种是对较低管理层的问卷调查法。在深度面对面访谈的情况下，提供了更全面的理解。有必要与首席营运官(COO)进行深入的面谈，以了解运作的动态和原则。COO可以有效地作为指导团队的人发挥作用，因此需要对COO进行深入的采访。然而，深度访谈的常见缺点在此过程中被发现。
要满足相关参与者的繁忙日程是很困难的(Brinkmann, 2014)。在这个过程中，我们获得了一个内在的片面观点。在问卷调查的情况下，获得相关答案的速度更快，也更容易。用这种方法比较容易整理更多的信息。与研究相关的答案在这份问卷中得到。这些问题基本上都是封闭的，只有少数问题是人们可以发表意见的。在这种问卷调查方法的情况下，对情况没有全面的了解(Brinkmann, 2014)。只讨论了与服务有关的某些问题和管理的一般问题。但是，没有对工人的问题和沟通中的问题进行详细的讨论。通过反思，从这两种数据收集方法中，我们发现了一些与形势相关的见解和重要变量。
The organizational chart that has been generated explains the heuristics of the processes in Hilton Sydney event operation. The general manager is in control over this division. The exact heuristics of the process was gathered from research. It has been found that the departments of the company include financial department, service sector such as housekeeping, security and engineering manager, sales department, food & beverage department and a separate human resources department. The exact division and allocation of the responsibilities were gathered in this process. On retrospection, two kinds of research were undertaken, it was the one on interview with the Chief operating officer and questionnaire method with the lower management. In the case of in depth face to face interview, there was the provision of more comprehensive understanding. There was a need to conduct in depth interview with the Chief operating officer (COO) to understand the dynamics and the tenets of operation. The COO effectively functions as the person who directs the team, and hence there was a need for in depth interview with the COO. Nevertheless, the common disadvantages of in depth interviews were found during this process.
research paper 代写：日程
It was difficult to meet the relevant participant with their busy schedules (Brinkmann, 2014). There is an inherent one sided perspective that is gained during this process. In the case of questionnaire method, it was faster and easier to get relevant answers. It was easier to collate more information in this method. The relevant answers pertaining to the research was obtained in this questionnaire. The questions were mostly closed except a few where there is space for the people to voice their opinion. In the case of this questionnaire method, there is no comprehensive understanding of the situation (Brinkmann, 2014). Only certain issues related to services were discussed and general questions of management. However, the issues of the workers and the issues in communication were not discussed in detail. On reflection, from both these data collection methods, a number of insights and the important variable relevant to the situation were deciphered.
