美国麻省理工学院论文代写:新媒体给社会带来的影响
随着新的媒体工具和社交网络的应用越来越广泛，世界危机的强大图像被直接传送到全球各地的笔记本和智能手机上，而新的媒体价值意味着讲述故事的故事情节变得更加形式化了。这种形式被用来向个人展示新闻，并且对观众对事实的追求、他们的文化敏感性、价值和更多的东西敏感。观众的真实世界被映射到演讲中;这种映射是通过框架理论(Tuchman,1978)实现的。在为观众制定新闻的时候，有了更好的消息(Gamson等人，1992)。这是通过使用文本和可视的相互作用完成的。文本演示通常使用两个参数，称为选择和salience(Entman,1993)。
美国麻省理工学院论文代写:新媒体给社会带来的影响
当涉及到媒体的形象表达时，这种选择和显著性同样强大。不管听众的个人背景如何，如他们的历史、他们的文化和更多，所有的人都对孩子们的苦难十分敏感。因此，媒体对遭受苦难的儿童的描述，因此被框定为一种激发思考和行动的方式，同时也使社会更清楚地认识到包围未来几代人的问题。演讲中有两个目的，作为受难者的形象是为观众而设的，所以框架到底为观众做了什么。摄影记者是同情还是仅仅是为了表达事实?这些问题和他们所代表的原始问题一样，仍然存在着无法解决的问题。
美国麻省理工学院论文代写:新媒体给社会带来的影响
As new media tools and social networks have become more widely utilized, the powerful images of the world’s crises are delivered directly to the laptops and smartphones of people around the globe and the newer media value means that the narrative story telling scope is become more formalized. This formalization is used to present news to the individual and is sensitive of the audience’s quest for facts, their cultural sensitivity, values and more. The real world of the audience is mapped into the presentations; this mapping is achieved by means of a framing theory (Tuchman, 1978). In framing the news for the audience there news reaches them better (Gamson et al, 1992). This is done using both textual and visual interplay. Textual presentations are often made more powerful using two parameters called as selection and salience (Entman, 1993).
美国麻省理工学院论文代写:新媒体给社会带来的影响
This selection and salience is just as equally powerful when it comes to image representations in the media. Irrespective of the personal background of the audience, such as their history, their culture and more, all people are quite attuned to the suffering of young children. Media representations of suffering young children are therefore framed in such a way to provoke thinking and action and also to make the society more aware of the problems besieging future generations. There are two ends to the presentations, as the image of the suffering child is framed for the audience, so what exactly does the frame achieve for the audience. Does the photojournalist draw in sympathy or is the photojournalistic method merely to represent a fact? These are some questions that vastly remain unresolved just like the original problem that they represent.
