Medical negligence takes place at the time when a dentist, doctor, surgeon, nurse or any other professional associated with the medical field carries out their task in a manner which differs from the established medical rules of care (Gallagher et. al., 2007). In case if a doctor violates the regulations and laws concerning how to treat or deal a patient as well as performs something which goes against the set laws then that physician or doctor has been unsuccessful in performing his or her job and is supposed to be negligent. Despite the fact that medical negligence doesn’t always lead to harm to a person, it is still regarded as being negligent. Medical negligence is time and again mixed up with medical malpractice, but in actuality, negligence is just one facet of meritorious medical misconduct assertion (Cranberg et. al.,2007). In context to medical misconduct tort regulation, medical negligence is generally the grounds for a charge asking for a compensation for harm caused to a patient through a medical professional or doctor or other medical professional.
Additionally, just as vehicle drivers hold an obligation to drive carefully and not harm others, doctors or practitioners hold a duty towards their patients, to nurse and treat them as per the established medical rules of care and prevent causing them any type of unjustified injury (Kessler and Mark, 1996). When doctors are granted the skills to treat people, they take a vow that is basically a pledge that they would treat people properly and in the best possible way and would make sure that they don’t harm them in any way (Tettenborn et. al., 2003). However, when any medical professional or doctor operates against this pledge, they are regarded as being negligent in legal aspects. Moreover, when deciding if a medical professional operated neglectfully, a professional medical spectator and the court would judge their performance with the set medical rules of care (Studdert, 2006).