论文代写：美国税收
文章概述了政府低收入税收政府收入增加的结果。因此，这一概念由特朗普总统综合，因为受雇的经济顾问强烈同意这个事实（Bedard，2016）。据认为，加拿大的税种包括联邦公司税和公司税。虽然美国自由州的企业所得税突出表明，加拿大是经合组织国家的第三低，而美国是最后一个。然而，联邦和省的税率相结合，他们排在第23位，估计在税收减免之后，排在第12位（Bedard，2016）。还要强调的是，特朗普提出的税收计划为该组织提供了10％的利润回收奖励。据估计，由于将利润转移到海外，美国税务师们的公司将有超过2.3万亿美元的警戒。因此，某些首席执行官和组织负责人指出，一次性回扣可以被各种公司利用，以在美国恢复业务（Bedard，2016年）。
论文代写：美国税收
此外，一些组织之间的合并交易已经发生，以享受加拿大的税收优惠和组织友好的规定对在国外积累的公司利润回收。因此，文章中明显强调，如果加拿大的税率没有变化，那么这些组织将从加拿大转移到美国将是有利的（Bedard，2016）。文章还指出，由于特朗普强调的商业友好的主张，在美国境内的边界南方将会组建新的组织，同时迎合加拿大的要求。因此，加拿大的竞争力受到投资下降和创业损失的恐惧和威胁（Bedard，2016）。如果执行特朗普计划的话，情况尤其如此，因为这将消除加拿大各地的财政优势。特朗普设计的定制程序引入的各种功能越来越吸引企业。此外，碳税支持者，正如文章所暗示的那样，主张这些措施将有助于加强加拿大的经济，但事实并非如此。
论文代写：美国税收
It is outlined in the article that low income taxes for the government results as increased governmental revenues. Hence, this notion is integrated by President Trump due to the strong agreement to this fact by the economic advisers employed (Bedard, 2016). It is considered that the varieties of taxes are in place at Canada inclusive of federal corporate tax and corporate tax. While the corporate income tax Free states of United States are highlighted with the assertion that Canada is third lowest for OECD nations, while US is last. However, the combination of federal and provincial tax rates placed them on 23rd and it is estimated to rise at the 12th position within this rank after the cuts of tax (Bedard, 2016). It is also emphasized that the tax plan articulated by Trump offers the organization with incentive of 10 per cent tax over the repatriation of profit. It is estimated that more than $2.3 trillion is guarded by the corporations from the taxman of United States due to moving the profits overseas. Therefore, it is indicated by certain CEOs and head of organizations that one time rebate can be taken advantage of by variety of corporations to move back their operations in United States (Bedard, 2016).
论文代写：美国税收
Moreover, the merger deals among certain organizations had taken place to enjoy the tax benefits and the organization friendly regulations of Canada over the corporate profits repatriation accumulated abroad. Hence, it is evidently highlighted in the article that if the tax rates of Canada do not change, it will be advantageous for the organizations to shift their operations from Canada to United States (Bedard, 2016). The article also suggests that newer organizations will be formed at the border’s south within the United States while catering to the Canadian demands due to the business friendly proposition enforced by Trump. Therefore, it is fear and threat for the competitiveness of Canada to experience investment drops and loss of business creation (Bedard, 2016). This is particularly the case if the application of Trump’s program is performed, as it will remove the fiscal merits across Canada. The variety of features introduced by the customized program devised by Trump is increasingly attracting the corporations. Furthermore, carbon tax supporters, as can be implied by the article, have advocated that these measures will help enhance Canadian economy, but this is not the case.
