英国约克论文代写：市场效率
EMH概念的主要假设是完美市场的假设。在完美市场的情况下，没有交易的成本，没有信息的成本。除此之外，投资者的期望是同质的，这使得他们的理性是理性的，因此，市场的效率也是如此。一个有效的市场可以被认为是与证券相关的价格提供充分反映信息的一个市场。在现实世界的背景下，EMH在完美市场中的潜在假设最终不会被持有，因此市场上缺乏充分的效率(瞧，2012年)。然而，一些证据表明，即使在社会功能不完善的情况下，市场的效率也会达到一个特定的极限，因为对新信息作出反应的价格会调整。即便如此，如果现实世界的市场倾向于对基本面价值的反映进行调整，它们也会被认为是不那么确定的。
英国约克论文代写：市场效率
其次是银行系统故障系统的和最近的全球金融危机,有清晰的事实失败相关的许多假设完美的市场,突出存在的非理性的投资者,异构的期望、信息不对称和交易成本导致价格泡沫和错误定价。这通常会破坏EMH的概念。然而，如果交易律师在扮演诉讼律师角色的过程中成功地通过实际创造交易价值来增加商业交易的价值，这是值得怀疑的。怀疑论者可能会把对律师的考虑考虑为在最坏的情况下杀死寄生虫的最佳选择的必要成本。许多学者都在努力证明，律师会成功地增加交易的价值，因为在EMH(Flifel 2012)下，潜在的假设并不存在。
英国约克论文代写：市场效率
The main assumptions for the concept of EMH are the assumptions of perfect market. In the situation of perfect market, there are no costs of transaction, with no cost for availing information. In addition to this, the expectations of investors are homogenous making them rational by nature, and hence, there is efficiency of markets. An efficient market can be considered as the one within which prices related to securities provide full reflection of information available. In the setting of real world, the underlying assumptions of EMH in perfect market do not end up being held and hence, there is lack of full efficiency in the market (Lo 2012). However, a number of evidences have stated that even in the scenario of imperfect world within which the society functions, there is efficiency of markets to a specific limit as there is adjustment of price for responding to a new piece of information. Even though, if markets of real world tend to be adjusting for reflection of fundamental value, they can be considered as less certain.
英国约克论文代写：市场效率
Followed by the systematically failing system of banking and the recent crisis of global finance, there is clarity in the fact that failure of a number of assumptions related to perfect market and the prominent existence of irrational investors, heterogeneous expectations, information asymmetries and transaction costs has resulted in price bubbles and mispricing. This holds the tendency to generally undermine the concept of EMH. However, it is doubtful if transactional lawyers, playing the role of litigation lawyers become successful in adding value to the commercial transactions by the actual creation of deal value. Skeptic may show consideration towards lawyers for being a necessary cost of transaction at the best options while dealing to kill parasites in the worst scenario. A number of scholars have put in effort for demonstrating the ways in which a lawyer will be successful in increasing the deal value actually in the precise real work as the underlying assumptions are not held under EMH (Flifel 2012).
