英国论文怎么写：主权保护
中国人在南沙群岛的行动使与美国的对抗更加复杂;尽管多年来一直致力于防止这种情况发生（Lygdamus.com，2017），但这两个国家的安全社区已经认识到这些行动有能力发起武装冲突。中国习近平认为，坚持发展道路是必要的，以便作为一个国家强大和富有，这需要广泛利用海洋。投资300多亿美元的岛屿被认为是无可争议的。然而，北京的公共话语避免了所述投资与国家安全目标（“杜特尔特和东南亚的美中中国权力平衡”，2017）的可能联系。据中国介绍，中国的海岛填海工程在国际义务和责任方面具有重要意义，如海上救援和研究，防灾减灾，气象观测，航行安全，海洋科学研究，渔业生产和等等。这是为了向来自其他国家的船只提供所需的服务，以及在中国南海航行的中国船只。
英国论文怎么写：主权保护
中国认真捍卫这一倡议，不愿意接受任何形式的侵犯主权和损害安全利益的航行自由。有人强调，中国的坚定主张南海主权防御和相关权，同时维护该地区的稳定与和平（拉森，2017年）。有人强调，鉴于中国过去的行为，这些努力可能会破坏安全，和平与稳定，岛屿复垦倡议将被视为暂时取得外交收益的临时缓解措施，而不是完全改变总体方法（Acharya，2017）。中国的战略旨在改变水的事实，加强国家的地位，同时巩固与邻国的经济联系，使其更接近中国的轨道。这将使邻国对北京及其权力充满挑战。为了坚持这一战略，北京方面已经进行了调整行动，并在调拨时间和增加紧张程度以平衡南中国海地区增量收益之间进行交替。这也与邻居保持足够的善意。这可以用2012年中期的激烈时期为例，其中包括抓住斯卡伯勒浅滩，随后在2013年底推出新的东盟 – 中国关系框架。当中国在独家经济区域推进石油钻井平台时，进一步的紧张局势激化越南（Emmerson，2017）。
英国论文怎么写：主权保护
The actions of the Chinese at Spratlys has complicated the rivalry with the US; security communities in both the nations have recognised that the actions have the ability of erupting into armed conflict though years have been dedicated to prevent such a situation (Lygdamus.com, 2017). Xi Jinping of China was of the opinion that it is essential to adhere to a developmental path in order to be powerful and rich as a state and this required extensive utilisation of the sea. More than $ 30 billion investments in the islands were considered indisputable. However, the public discourse of Beijing avoided possible connections of the said investment towards the nation’s security goals (“Duterte and the US-China balance of power in South-east Asia”, 2017). According to China, the island reclamation by China would be relevant in terms of international obligations and responsibilities such as maritime rescue and research, prevention of disasters and their mitigation, meteorological observation, navigational safety, scientific research in the arena of marine, fishery production and so on. This would be for the purpose of providing required services to the vessels from other nations along with China that sail in South China Sea.
英国论文怎么写：主权保护
China earnestly defended the initiative and was reluctant to accept any form of act that would be in the disguise of navigational freedom violating sovereignty and damaging security related interests. It was stressed that the resolute of China was in sovereignty defence and the related rights in South China Sea along with safeguarding stability and peace within the region (Larsen, 2017). It was emphasized that the efforts may undermine security, peace and stability in view of the past behaviour of China, the initiative of island reclamation would be perceived as a temporary reprieve for achieving the diplomatic gains in the short term and not a complete change to the overall approach (Acharya, 2017). The strategy of China is has been designed to alter the facts on water for strengthening the position of the nation and simultaneously cementing the economic ties with the neighbours for drawing them nearer into the orbit of China. This would make the neighbouring states vary of challenging Beijing and its power. In order to assert the strategy, Beijing has engaged in calibrating the actions and alternating among period of dialling down and ratcheting up the level of tension for balancing incremental gains in the South China Sea region. This also preserves sufficient goodwill with the neighbours. This can be exemplified by the heated period in mid – 2012 that included seize of Scarborough Shoal that was followed by unveiling the new ASEAN – China relation framework in the late 2013. Further tension was stoked when China moved an oil rig in the exclusive economic region of Vietnam (Emmerson, 2017).
