论文代写：政治学
Condor,Tileaga和Billig(2013)认为，随着政治科学话语的改变，政治修辞的话语也发生了变化。因此，在此之前，或在古典时期，演说家或政治领袖的花言巧语只局限于口头演讲和他们用来对付大众听众的手势。然而，今天的政治领导人使用数字平台通过他们的言辞来说服他们的听众。因此，在数字媒体或数字平台的引入下，政治和娱乐之间的区别已经模糊了。然而，在唐纳德·特朗普(Donald Trump)的讲话中，美国总统只依赖他的口头演讲和手势(Time.com)。2017)。
论文代写：政治学
希腊的诡辩家认为，随着“好修辞”的存在，“拙劣的修辞”也存在。据批评人士称，寻求“拙劣言辞”的演讲者显然扮演了政治家的角色。然而，演讲者在政治舞台上扮演着政治家的角色，至少在一般意义上是政治的。政治上的花言巧语是用来造福人民的。然而，在“坏政治”的情况下，这是不正确的。在“坏政治”的情况下，修辞被用来满足私人或个人的利益。此外,在“坏言论”的情况下,商标不是给定的重要性,观众在这种情况下被认为是单纯的生物元素和观众的理性自我忽视在这种情况下(Załęska,2011)。因此，可以说特朗普实际上选择了“糟糕的言辞”。他相信，少年童子军的年轻人会相信媒体总是反对特朗普，因为他被人民所爱戴。因此，他在演讲中忽视了青年的理性自我。
论文代写：政治学
Condor, Tileaga and Billig (2013) are of the opinion that with the change in the discourse of political science there has been the change in the discourse of political rhetoric. Therefore, previously, or during the classical period the rhetoric of the orator or the political leader was restricted only to the oral speeches and the gestures that they use to address the mass audience. However, today the political leaders use the digital platform to persuade their audience through their rhetoric. Hence, the distinction that was there between both politics and entertainment has been blurred with the introduction of the digital media or the digital platform. However, in case of speech of Donald Trump, the president of America had dependent on his oral speech and gestures only (Time.com. 2017).
论文代写：政治学
Greek sophists believed that along with the existence of “good rhetoric”, there is an existence of the “bad rhetoric”. According to critics, the speaker who seeks to “bad rhetoric” obviously plays the role of a politician. However, speakers play the role of the politician without strictly being within the arena of politics, at least what is meant by politics in general sense. The political rhetoric is used for the common good of the people. However, it is something that is not true in case of the “bad politics”. In case of the “bad politics”, rhetoric has been used to fulfil the private or the personal interests. Moreover, in case of “bad rhetoric”, logos is not given much of importance, as the audience in this case is regarded as the mere biological elements and the rational self of the audience is disregarded in this case (Załęska, 2011). Therefore, it can be said that Trump has actually opted for the “bad rhetoric”. He believed that the youth in the Boy Scout will believe that the media has always been against Trump, as he is loved by the people. Thus, he disregarded the rational self of the youth in his speech.
