论文代写：网络铁路
公司的目标开始改变。安全与安全的最终目标被忽视了。目标柔性原则是一种理论原则。这在这个范例中被改变了。据了解，公司需要改变经营程序，以满足所有股东的需要(Clarence,2003)。然而，也有一个模糊的类比，即不满足真正的支持因素。公司需要回顾和调查所有的操作程序，以满足形势的需要。有很多目标需要培养。然而，必须有吸引人的激励机制，在资源配置中存在扭曲，以创建不同的目标。它最初报道,网络铁路问题创造了支付£733 m公司作为补偿的哈特菲尔德崩溃。然而,发现承诺£199的税前利润为2001年提供给股东作为一个激励(埃文斯,2007)。
论文代写：网络铁路
该公司必须就政府的资金来源作出答复，向股东支付股息(埃文斯，2004年)。可以指出的是，股东的利益似乎是优先考虑的。这是由于金融压力造成的。看来，网络铁路真的没有机会持续维护利益相关者安全所需要的标准。必须加强对工作人员的培训。这肯定是为了确保列车工程或检查需要解决生存挑战(Martin,2010)。很明显，在保持所有利益相关者的利益之间必须有一个平衡。然而，在保持平衡的过程中，不应忽视安全等某些必要因素。公司需要为员工提供更多的培训和持续的绩效评估标准，以确保利益相关者的利益在这个过程中得到维护。为了防止未来发生更大的丑闻和事故，公司需要有更好的安全标准。由于缺乏适当的治理和模糊的目标，导致公司的所有人都受到各种各样的影响。引发丑闻的下一个因素是当时的环境。下面详细介绍了这些内容。
论文代写：网络铁路
A change was initiated in the goals of the company. The ultimate goal of safety and security was overlooked. The goal flexibility principle is a theoretical principle. This was applied was changed in this paradigm. It is comprehended that the companies need to change their operational procedures in order to meet the needs of all the shareholders (Clarence, 2003). However, there is the vague analogy of not meeting the real sustenance factors. The company needs to retrospect and look into all the operational procedures in order to meet the needs of the situation. There are multiple goals that need to be fostered. However, there must be attractive incentives where there can be distortion in the resource allocation to create the different goals. It was initially reported that the Network Rail issue created the company to pay £733m as compensation for the Hatfield crash. However, it was found that promise of a pre-tax profit of £199m for the year 2001 was provided to the shareholders as an incentive (Evans, 2007).
论文代写：网络铁路
The company had to reply on the funding sources from the government to pay dividends to the shareholders (Evans, 2004). It can be alluded that the interest of the shareholders seems to take primary priority. This is owing to the pressure of financial stresses. It seems that the Network Rail really did not have a chance to constantly maintain the standards required for the safety of the stakeholders. There must been enhanced training provided to the staff. This must have been done to ensure that the train engineering or inspection needs to address the survival challenge (Martin, 2010). It is evident that there must be a balance between maintaining the interest of all the stakeholders. However, certain imperative factors such as safety should not be overlooked in the process of maintaining balance. The company needs to provide more training for the staff and continual performance evaluation standard to ensure that the stakeholder interests are maintained in this process. The company needed to have better safety standards in order to prevent bigger scandals and accidents in the future. Lack of this proper governance and nebulous goals setting had caused all the people involved with the company to be impacted in a variety of ways. The next factor that causes a scandal is the prevailing environment. These have been detailed in the following.
