论文代写：美德
在男孩较少的指导下，他们可以做出独立于任何其他责任的决定。他们可能只考虑自己，没有信息等于“独立”，根据管理和案例研究讲座。另一方面，人们认为女孩们会被提升来谈判每一种情况。女孩们会分析情况，根据分析结果决定做出决定。女孩的这种美德，以及一些更为传统和刻板的女性美德，理应帮助她们成为未来的优秀管理者。现在，当我思考这个前提的意义时，我会说，尽管这听起来完全支持老套的观点，在某处，这句话是有意义的。女人不容易冲动地马上投入到情况中，如果她们能做得更好。女性也倾向于在头脑中进行谈判，以了解最佳的行动方针，这将为自己和周围的人带来好处。是的，这些美德是典型的，因为不是所有的女人都是这样的，但这并不意味着诸如谈判和推理这样的美德不会成为一个好的管理者。我认为一个更好的说法是，无论男性还是女性，当孩子在做出决定的过程中，以及在他们周围的其他人是如何受到决定影响的时候，他们肯定会成为一个好的管理者。
论文代写：美德
这可能是一个积极的发展，如果一个人认为刻板印象只是一种刻板印象，并理解与刻板印象分开的美德。任何一个不分性别的孩子都可以有耐心、同情和更多的美德，这是典型的典型，只有女孩或女人。任何具有这些美德的人都将是一个好的管理者，并将在管理中扮演积极的角色。这种对女性的理解，刻板的观念，美德和工作场所管理都是一件好事。它提出了为什么这些观念是典型的，为什么有必要理解这些美德是属于每个人而不仅仅是女人。另一方面，如果我认为这是一种消极的看法，我相信没有多少知识可以获得。这可能只是女权主义者一直在为之奋斗的另一件事，没有人会听。考虑到这是一个积极的发展，它至少有可能把这个问题提出来进行适当的辩论。
论文代写：美德
Where the boys have lesser guidance, they get to take decisions that are independent of any other responsibility. They might think only of themselves, the absence of message equals the message “be independent”, according to the management and case study lectures. Girls on the other hand are seen to be raised to negotiate every situation. Girls would analyze situations and based on analysis would decide to take a decision. This virtue of the girl child and some of the more traditional and stereotypical womanly virtues supposedly help them in becoming good managers in the future. Now when I ponder what to make of this premise, I would say albeit it sounds downright supporting stereotypical notions, somewhere the sentence makes sense. Women do not jump into situations right away impulsively, and if they do they learn better. Women also tend to negotiate situations in the mind in order to understand the best possible course of action that delivers benefits for themselves as well as others around them. Yes, these virtues are stereotypical because not all women are like this, but that does not mean these virtues such as negotiation and reasoning does not make a good manager. I think a better way to have stated this is irrespective of the male child or female child, when the child negotiates and reasons in making a decision and wonders about how others around them are impacted by the decision, and then they would definitely make a good manager. Where the boys have lesser guidance, they get to take decisions that are independent of any other responsibility. They might think only of themselves, the absence of message equals the message “be independent”, according to the management and case study lectures. Girls on the other hand are seen to be raised to negotiate every situation. Girls would analyze situations and based on analysis would decide to take a decision. This virtue of the girl child and some of the more traditional and stereotypical womanly virtues supposedly help them in becoming good managers in the future. Now when I ponder what to make of this premise, I would say albeit it sounds downright supporting stereotypical notions, somewhere the sentence makes sense. Women do not jump into situations right away impulsively, and if they do they learn better. Women also tend to negotiate situations in the mind in order to understand the best possible course of action that delivers benefits for themselves as well as others around them. Yes, these virtues are stereotypical because not all women are like this, but that does not mean these virtues such as negotiation and reasoning does not make a good manager. I think a better way to have stated this is irrespective of the male child or female child, when the child negotiates and reasons in making a decision and wonders about how others around them are impacted by the decision, and then they would definitely make a good manager.
论文代写：美德
This could be a positive development, if one was to consider the stereotype as just a stereotype and understand the virtue as being separated from the stereotype. Any children irrespective of gender could have the virtues of patience, compassion and more which is stereotypically attributed to only the girl child or the woman. Any individual with these virtues would be a good manager and would play a positive role in management. This development of understanding women, stereotypical notions, virtues and the workplace management is definitely a good thing. It brings forth arguments on why these notions are stereotypical and why it is necessary to understand those virtues as belonging to everybody and not just the woman. On the other hand, if I was to argue for this same development as a negative perception, I believe that there is not much knowledge to gain. It might just end up as one more thing that feminists are always fighting for and which nobody ends up listening. In thinking of it as a positive development, it will at least be possible to bring the issue to light for a proper debate.
