论文代写：可持续发展
可持续性的基本讨论始于可持续发展的Brundtland定义。“可持续发展是在不损害子孙后代满足自身需求的前提下满足当前需求的发展”(IISD,2017,para)。1)可持续发展的三大支柱对这一关于可持续发展的Brundtland定义提供了更广泛的理解。三大支柱是环境可持续性、经济可持续性和社会可持续性。可持续性是一种持续、无限期地持续、无限期地持续定义和确立行为的能力，这表明坚持可持续发展的三大支柱。对环境的可持续性指的是利用自然资源的能力，使污染创造、使用或资源枯竭将满足不确定的使用需求。经济可持续性是指公司的能力，使它能够对公司有无限的经济支持。最后，社会可持续性的第三个支柱是指一个公司对其影响的人的社会福利增加的能力(Azapagic & Perdan,2000)。
论文代写：可持续发展
这是概念上的基础，但可持续性从许多角度分析了多年，而不仅仅是概念层面。更著名的分析是在企业社会责任的社会责任范围内进行的。这个概念被讨论的扩展领域导致了对Brundtland定义的拒绝，因为它只提到了可持续发展。它已经使社会发展比环境保护更重要。在这三大支柱中，社会支柱将得到加强，因为重点是发展。阿尔伯塔大学的在推动可持续发展提供了一个更加平衡的定义当他们国家“可持续发展是一个过程,生活范围内可用的物理、自然和社会资源的方式让人类的生命系统嵌入式永久繁荣”(2013年麦吉尔,p.3)。因此，可持续性是一个行动的过程，在这个过程中，同样重要的是保护物理、自然和社会资源，以便使它们能够继续永续。通常，企业个人和企业管理层都有责任确保三根支柱的意识形态在其政策制定中得到满足。
论文代写：可持续发展
The foundational discussion of sustainability starts with the Brundtland definition of sustainable development. “Sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs” (IISD, 2017, para. 1). The three pillars of sustainability offer a more popular understanding of this Brundtland definition of sustainability. The three pillars are environmental sustainability, economic sustainability and social sustainability. Sustainability is the ability to continue a defined and established behaviour consistently and indefinitely, which shows adherence to the three pillars of sustainability. Sustainability with respect to the environment refers to the ability to make use of natural resources in a way that pollution creation, usage or resource depletion will meet indefinite usage needs. Economic sustainability refers to the capability of the company that enables it to have an indefinite economic support for the company. Finally, the third pillar of social sustainability refers to the ability of a company that adds to the social wellbeing of the people whom it affects (Azapagic & Perdan, 2000).
论文代写：可持续发展
This is the conceptual foundation, but sustainability has been critically analysed from many perspectives over the years and not just at concept level. The more famous analysis is the one done within the context of Corporate Social Responsibility CSR. The expanded realm in which the concept came to be discussed led to the rejection of the Brundtland definition on the grounds that it only referred to sustainable development. It has already given social development more importance than environmental conservation. Of the three pillars, the social pillar will be strengthened as the focus is on development. The University of Alberta in its drive to sustainability offers a more balanced definition when they state that “sustainability is the process of living within the limits of available physical, natural and social resources in ways that allow the living systems in which humans are embedded to thrive in perpetuity” (McGill, 2013, p.3). Therefore, sustainability is the course of action where equal importance is given to conserving physical, natural and social resources so as to enable them to continue in perpetuity. It is typically the responsibility of both the corporate individual and the corporate management to ensure that the ideologies of three pillars of sustainability are met in their policy formulations.
