论文代写：国际货币
作者指出了国际货币基金组织在澳大利亚经济、加拿大和新加坡所指出的一些问题。这三个国家的私人债务正在增长。在澳大利亚经济中，人们可以注意到，银行实际上是在寻求平衡房地产市场的需求，以控制私人和公共债务。对澳大利亚来说，目前的问题是其债务高达152万亿美元(199万亿美元)。这相当于全球国内生产总值(gdp)的225%，创下历史新高。其中约三分之二是私人债务。笔者认为，IMF对澳大利亚债务的看法是非常重要的。如果债务水平较高，那么它就会导致该国的高负债状况(悉尼先驱晨报，2016)。宏观经济稳定受到挑战，资产稳定性问题也出现在这里。高负债的出现不仅会导致企业和工业层面的消费中断，而且在家庭中也会出现这种情况。私人部门的债务水平在这一点上增加了，这导致了普遍的经济衰退。此外,债务的情况可能也将处于风险状态的国家衡量财务杠杆可能不是有效的,它只可能注意到恶化的经济随着经济开始减速,资产价格开始下降(悉尼先驱晨报》,2016)。
论文代写：国际货币
这篇文章接着介绍了国际货币基金组织在改善形势方面所提出的一些关键建议。首先，作者写了国际货币基金组织关于对国家税收优惠的建议，例如负杠杆。负杠杆将鼓励更多的借贷，并确保有更多的流动。作者并不是只关注澳大利亚经济的问题，而是提出了中国经济的问题，使得比较比较容易(悉尼先驱晨报，2016)。还充分展示了适当的事实和数字，例如债务水平上升的百分比和它们上升的时间。作者将增加的抵押债务归结为抵押债务，在这一点上，也有必要引入讨论环境，这些变化是由类似的国家所合并的，这些国家面临着这些问题。作者并没有将这些例子引入上下文。诸如“历史告诉我们，在上升的时候，很容易低估与私人债务相关的风险”，因此没有得到支持(悉尼先驱晨报，2016)。如果这篇文章包含了一些实际的历史案例，那么这篇文章本可以更有代表性。
论文代写：国际货币
The author points out some of the issues noted in the Australian economy, Canada and Singapore by the International monetary fund. The private debt of these three countries are growing. In the Australian economy, it can be noticed that banks are in fact seeking to balance needs in property market in order to control private and public debt. For Australia, the current issues are that its debt stands at $US152 trillion ($199 trillion). That equates to 225 per cent of the world’s gross domestic product, an all-time high. About two-thirds of the total is private debt. The author is indeed right in representing the IMF view on Australian debt as a very critical one. Where there are higher debt levels, then it results in situation of high debt vulnerabilities for the country (Sydney Morning Herald, 2016). Macroeconomic stability is challenged and asset stability issues are caused here. The presence of high debts will lead to a disrupted consumption not only at enterprise and industrial level, but this is also the case in households. Private sector debt levels increase at this point and this leads to a general economic downturn. Furthermore, the situation of debt might also put the country in a risk state where the country measure of financial leverage might not be that effective and it might be possible to notice a deteriorating economy only as the economy begins to slow down and the asset prices start to fall (Sydney Morning Herald, 2016).The author points out some of the issues noted in the Australian economy, Canada and Singapore by the International monetary fund. The private debt of these three countries are growing. In the Australian economy, it can be noticed that banks are in fact seeking to balance needs in property market in order to control private and public debt. For Australia, the current issues are that its debt stands at $US152 trillion ($199 trillion). That equates to 225 per cent of the world’s gross domestic product, an all-time high. About two-thirds of the total is private debt. The author is indeed right in representing the IMF view on Australian debt as a very critical one. Where there are higher debt levels, then it results in situation of high debt vulnerabilities for the country (Sydney Morning Herald, 2016). Macroeconomic stability is challenged and asset stability issues are caused here. The presence of high debts will lead to a disrupted consumption not only at enterprise and industrial level, but this is also the case in households. Private sector debt levels increase at this point and this leads to a general economic downturn. Furthermore, the situation of debt might also put the country in a risk state where the country measure of financial leverage might not be that effective and it might be possible to notice a deteriorating economy only as the economy begins to slow down and the asset prices start to fall (Sydney Morning Herald, 2016).
论文代写：国际货币
The article goes on to present some of the key recommendations that is made by the IMF with respect to improving the situation. Primarily, the author writes about the IMF recommendation on tax incentives for the country such as that of negative gearing. Negative gearing would encourage more borrowing and will ensure that there is more movement. The author does not focus only on the issues for the Australian economy, but rather also presents the issues for the Chinese economy which makes it easier to draw comparative contexts (Sydney Morning Herald, 2016). The presentation of proper facts and figures such as the percentage at which the debt levels have risen and the time within which they have risen are also presented adequately. Author attributes the increase to mortgage debt at which point it is also necessary to bring into discussion context, the changes that are incorporated by similar countries which faced these issues. Author does not bring such examples into context. Quotes such as “History has taught us that it is very easy to underestimate the risks associated with private debt during the upswing”, hence does not find support (Sydney Morning Herald, 2016). The article could have been more exemplary if it had included some of the actual historical examples.
