论文代写：供应管理
交易关系指的是双方都不担心对方的幸福(Tsay,2014)。如果一方在此模式中获得另一方的损失。这些都是一系列独立的交易。每一个交易都源于每个案例的优点。成本、数据和预测在范式中并没有真正共享。考虑的主要因素是产品的定价。关系的力量在于产品的定价方式。这种类型的关系的好处是，在购买时间和精力的时间相对较少。没有把重点放在判断和管理经验上。大量的投资是在供应商相互作用的方式上进行的。它是在不灵活的情况下形成的，因为灵活性是强制性要求的。然而，在这种情况下，并没有太多的情感因素。现代公司专注于发展不同利益相关者之间的关系。这些关系是在交易中涉及的双方之间形成的双向沟通。供应商对买方需求的响应性和明确的产品规范在这一范例中被考虑。认识到相互依存和合作的必要性是考虑的主要因素(Johnson,2014)。在这个方案中，重点是持续改进。我们关注的是物理资产规范的开发方式。这一过程更加透明和负责任。供应联盟的细微差别需要在这个模式中加以考虑。这就是机构信任的过程。目前的重点是供应联盟的发展。在这种模式下，成本的降低。
论文代写：供应管理
这不能发生在交易或合作关系中(Monczka等人，2015年)。这些发现是源于联盟中产生的协同效应。这些不能发生在事务或协作关系中。这些协同效应是由于直接和间接成本的减少，而这些成本与劳动力成本和间接成本有关。这些都是减少上市时间的原因。由于这一事实，服务作为主要驱动因素的服务减少，从而导致市场份额的提高，并提高了所有涉众的利润空间。根据这一点，可以理解利益相关者之间的关系是最重要的(Coyle et al .，2016)。这些必然会影响公司的持续发展方式。在供应链的协议中也有固有的边界公司决策。该公司试图做出市场营销和销售决策，以及需要考虑的供应管理决策。这些是需要考虑的重要变量。最有趣的一个概念是下游的“二元”关系(Booth,2014)。这些都需要被公司考虑在内。他们已经详细地介绍了以下内容。在二元关系的情况下，考虑两个利益相关者。这是当地的公司和买方。在这方面，供应商成本和买方为产品提供的价值是重要的变量。例如，原材料的价格是基于一般市场原则的。对于一些品牌来说，无形资产将会增加，在这些情况下，买家会为产品付出更多。这可以解释为剩余价值。在这个过程中，双方可以相互合作以增加价值。在这些情况下，将会出现竞争对手。这些将由供需变量决定。依赖于价值链的权力关系中的动态关系依赖于产品的供求关系。买卖关系需要了解关系的细微差别。在现代供应链的情况下，利益相关者之间的信息流(Lysons和Farrington,2016)。这被定义为有效处理信息的系统。在现代社会，传播过程也在不断发展。此外，这是基于对这些问题的主观解释的技术和文化规范的构建。关系中的演员被用来创造和改变世界，通过理解周围的不同元素
论文代写：供应管理
The transactional relationship is about having the concern where both parties are not worried about the other party’s well-being (Tsay, 2014). If one party gains some point other loses in this schema. These is formed a series of independent deals. Each of these transactions stems from the merits of each case. Costs, data and forecast are not really shared in the paradigm. The main factor that is considered is the pricing of the products. The power of the relationship is about how the products are priced. The advantages of this type of relationship are that there is a relatively less time in the purchase of time and effort. There is not focus on the judgment and managerial expertise. Considerable investment is done in the ways in which the vendors interact. It is formed on the notions where there is not flexible when flexibility is mandatorily required. However, there are not much emotional factors that are considered in this case. Modern companies focus on developing a relationship between the different stakeholders. These relationships are formed two-way communication between the two parties who are involved in the transaction. The supplier’s responsiveness to the requirements of the buyer and there is clear product specifications that are considered in this paradigm. An awareness of interdependence and the necessity of cooperation is the main factor that is considered (Johnson, 2014). In this scheme, there is focus on the continual improvement. There is focus on the ways in which the physical asset specification is developed. There is more transparency and accountability of the processes. The nuances of supply alliances need to be factored in this schema. There is the process of institutional trust. There is the focus on developing of the supply alliances. There is the reduction of cost that is observed in this paradigm.
论文代写：供应管理
This cannot occur in the transactional or collaborative relationship (Monczka et al., 2015). These are found to stem from the synergies that are created in the alliances. These cannot occur in the transactional or collaborative relationships. These synergies are from reduction of the direct and indirect costs that are involved in the labour and overhead costs. These are reduced time to market. Owing to this fact, there is reduction in the services that function as key drivers which subsequently lead to the improvement of the market share and it improved the profit margins of all the stakeholders involved. According to this, it can be comprehended that the relationship between the stakeholders are of primary importance (Coyle et al., 2016). These invariably impact the ways in which the companies are sustained. There are the innate boundary firm decisions that are also embedded in the protocols of supply chain. The company tries to make marketing and sales decisions along with the supply management decisions which need to be factored. These are the important variables that need to be considered. One of the most interesting notions is the downstream “dyadic” relationships (Booth, 2014). These need to be factored by the company as well. They have been detailed in the following. In cases of dyadic relationship, two stakeholders are considered. It is the local firm and the buyer. In this, the supplier costs and the value that the buyer places for the product are the important variables. For example, price of the raw material is based on the general market principles. For some brands, there will be increase in the intangibles, and in these situations the buyer is made to pay more for the product. This can be explained as the surplus value. In this the parties are found to work with each other to add value. In these instances, there will be competitors emerging. These will then be determined founded on the variables of supply and demand. The dynamics in the power relationship that depends on the value chain depends on supply and demand for product. Buyer and seller relationship needs to understand the nuances of the relationship. In the circumstance of the modern supply chains and streams of information that flow between stakeholders (Lysons and Farrington, 2016). This is defined as the system that is used to efficiently process information. In the modern times, there is the growth of the communication processes. In addition, this is constructed on the technology and the culture codes that are based on the subjective interpretation of each of these issues. The actors in the relationship are used to create and modify the world by making sense of the different elements that are surrounding them
