十一月 15, 2017

论文代写:功利主义

论文代写:功利主义

人类被认为是理性的,因为他们的推理、冥想和采取理性的行动,这是基于他们的影响哲学的简单原则。在这些原则中,功利主义以其民主诉求而闻名,并以其统一所有人类的方式,以造福于最大人数的方式采取行动。然而,当谈到吃和吃动物的饥饿或简单的快乐和能力时,功利主义的观点被扭曲了。吃动物,作为一种功利主义,不构成对大多数人最有利的,因为动物被杀死是为了满足胃的欲望。这种情况在吃动物的情况很少的时候会有所不同,比如极度缺乏素食选择和严重的生活条件。

论文代写:功利主义

在食物充足的情况下,同样的捕杀动物的行为是不合理的,因为没有动物或更少的动物需要被宰杀。吃动物和假设道德行为在那些认为自己是理性和缺乏情感的动物的人是很明显的。事实上,人类拥有超强能力的超能力动物使它们处于自然优势,杀死并吃掉它们。同样的行为,当有强大的人类杀死较弱的人类并吃掉它们的时候,它是不理性的,因为被杀的较弱的人类具有表达能力,并且能够表达预先的拒绝。当弱者预见到他们被更强大的人杀害时,他们会立即维护人权和基本权利,而不是被杀害或攻击为救世主。这否定了他们的论点,即动物是不理性的,因为它们更弱,它们可能被杀死和吃掉。吃动物的人忘记了意识到动物只是简单地缺乏表现力,像人类一样繁殖,并且拥有和人类一样的生存权利。

论文代写:功利主义

Humans are considered as rational owing to their acts of reasoning, contemplation, and taking rational actions, which is further based on simple principles of their influencing philosophy. Out of these principles, utilitarianism is famous for its democratic appeal, and the way it unify all mankind to act in ways which benefit the maximum number of people. However, when it comes to eating and eating animals out of hunger or simple pleasure and capability, the utilitarian view becomes distorted. Eating animals, as per utilitarianism, do not constitute the most good for the most people, because animals are killed for satiating the desires of the stomach. This could be seen differently when the conditions of eating animals are rare, such as dire lack of vegetarian options and severe living conditions.

论文代写:功利主义
The same act of killing animals for food is unjustified in conditions where there is plenty of food available for which no animals or fewer animals are required to be killed. Eating animals and assuming ethical behaviour are prominent in those who think themselves as rational and inexpressive animals as irrational. The very fact that humans have the superior capability of overpowering animals places them at a natural advantage to kill and eat them. The same act when taken in case of powerful humans killing weaker humans and eating them is uprightly irrational because weaker humans who are killed are expressive and are able to convey upfront rejection. When weaker humans anticipate their killing by stronger people, they immediately bring the upholding of human rights and fundamental right to live and not be killed or attacked as a saviour. This nullifies their argument that animals are irrational and because they are weaker they could be killed and eaten. Animal eaters forget to realise that animals are simply inexpressive, reproduce as humans, and have the same right to live as humans.

Copyright © 2020 · Essay Times 论文时 All Rights Reserved · Service & Product Provided Are Used Solely for The Purpose of Research Only