七月 16, 2020

论文代写:对非战斗人员的法律保护

本篇由英国论文时论文代写平台提供的文章主要讲的是对非战斗人员的法律保护。

论文代写:对非战斗人员的法律保护

以通常被称为“普遍反恐战争”的法律为基础的资格,是另一个值得辩论的问题。“反恐战争”有可能被视为一场非全球性的武装冲突,就像目前在阿富汗地区政府与不同武装组织(如塔利班残余势力和基地组织)之间的冲突一样。这种冲突是非全球性的,尽管全球因素以任何一方的外国军事存在的形式存在,因为它是在各自国内当局的许可和支持下进行的,而且不包括两个对立的国家。

论文代写:对非战斗人员的法律保护

因此,以阿富汗为基础的持续敌对行动是通过适用于非全球区域武装冲突的规则来管理的,这些规则是基于条约和国际人道主义法惯例的法律。同样的规则机构也适用于暴力程度已达到武装冲突,而非来自国家的武装行动者是该武装冲突的一方的相同情况。例如,非洲的索马里。

论文代写:对非战斗人员的法律保护

核心问题仍然是,从法律角度来看,所有在世界上几种艺术中进行的恐怖主义行为都是单一武装冲突的一部分。从另一种意义上说,格拉斯哥、伦敦、马德里、巴厘岛或卡萨布兰卡的自杀式爆炸事件可以归因于国际人道主义法下的一方。然而,事实并非如此。此外,在处理涉嫌策划或携带恐怖主义行为的个人时,美国有关当局显然不适用敌对规则行为。

论文代写:对非战斗人员的法律保护

如果武装冲突的范例是适用的,这是允许的。《国际人道主义法》的规则允许非法战斗人员直接以嫌犯为目标,也允许对人民造成附带损害,只要附带平民的损害不超过预期的军事利益。相反,执行的是试图逮捕嫌犯供以后审判的执法规则,并在这样做时注意疏散平民建筑,以避免对人或附近物体造成任何伤害。

论文代写:对非战斗人员的法律保护

The law based qualification on what is known often as “universal war on terror”, has been another considerable subject for debate. It is possible for the “war over terror” to be considered as a non-global armed conflict such as those presently evident in Afghanistan region between the government and different armed groups such as Taliban remnants and Al-Qaeda. Such a conflict is non-global, although with a global element in the form of foreign presence of military on any one side because it has been waged with the permission and support of domestic authorities respectively and does not include two opposing states.

论文代写:对非战斗人员的法律保护
The Afghanistan based ongoing hostilities are therefore governed through the rules that are applied to armed conflicts in non-global regions found within, laws based on treaty and IHL customs. The similar rules body is also applicable in same situations where the violence level has attained armed conflict and wherein armed actor not from states is a party to that armed conflict. For example, the state in Somalia, Africa.

论文代写:对非战斗人员的法律保护
The central question still remains that, taken collectively, all the terrorism acts carried out within several arts of the world are parts of a single armed conflict as per legal perspective. In another sense, it can be said that the Glasgow, London, Madrid, Bali or Casablanca suicidal bombings can be attributed to single party under IHL. However this is not the case. Additionally, it is also apparent that the concerned authorities in the states is not applicable to the hostility rule conduct when dealing with individuals under suspicion of either planning or carrying terrorist acts.

论文代写:对非战斗人员的法律保护
These would have been allowed if the paradigm of armed conflict was applicable. The rules of IHL have allowed unlawful combatants to target the suspects directly and also to cause collateral damage to people as long as the damage of incidental civilians is not more than the anticipated military advantage. Rather, the rules of law enforcement are applied which attempt at capturing the suspects for trial later on and take care when doing this, that civilian structures are evacuated so as to avoid any kind of injury to people or nearby objects.

Copyright © 2020 · Essay Times 论文时 All Rights Reserved · Service & Product Provided Are Used Solely for The Purpose of Research Only