加拿大拉哇大学论文代写:技术的发展
罗宾·威廉姆斯和大卫边缘(1996)进行了广泛的研究,发表了一份报告,关于社交元素的塑造在技术发展过程中发挥作用,他们也分析过去的研究技术如何影响社会环境(MacKenzie&Wageman,1985)。这项研究是分析新技术开发的创新过程是如何影响科技的发展。有广泛的研究和分析做什么形状技术,感知到的社会需求如何影响技术由不同领域的专家。认为创新的技术取决于经济因素和当前的市场需求。这种意识形态是主要专家最初的想法。(Cooombs et al .,1987)从各种人类学研究很明显,但是有很多多方面方面与技术的进步。威廉姆斯和优势的分析说,这开辟了两所学校的思想。第一个被风场如何影响“流通性”的必要性。
加拿大拉哇大学论文代写:技术的发展
Cronbergand问题的另一个流技术特点对公共环境的不可逆性(Callon,1993)。意识形态上面提到的证明问题是有更多的学术研究维度和讨论了这些问题使用理论例子从纯学术的角度来看。一个新的维度,这是之前没有考虑政策变化是如何对海温的结果。海温认为,之前的研究产品开发和新技术的出现源自知识获得,猜测的结果信息和产生新的想法。从这些创意产品开发。这代表了一个线性模型。这个模型在风场批评。技术的创新取决于不同的因素。新时期技术的出现在很大程度上是依赖于社会因素以及不同因素的传统方法扩展的线性模型的应用技术是批评。它被认为是过时的方法,他们不应该再练习。这是新一代的研究者和院士的意见(Fairclough,1992)。发现社会的建设性的技术发展方面,而不是仅仅从经济影响(Rip et al .,1995)其他研究人员说,他们积极参与政策制定和技术框架的帮助在发展中辩称,他们也扮演了重要的角色在技术的形成。
加拿大拉哇大学论文代写:技术的发展
Robin Williams and David Edge (1996) have conducted extensive research and published a report about how the shaping of the social elements plays a role in technological development in which they also analyse past research as to how the technology impacted the social environment (MacKenzie&Wageman, 1985). This research was done as to analyse how the innovation process involved for new technological development impacted the advancement of technology. There has been extensive studies and analysis done as to what shapes technologies, how the perceived social needs affect the technology by various experts of the field. A view that innovation in technology depends of the economic factors and the current market needs was put forward. This ideology was predominately in the minds of the experts initially. (Cooombs et al., 1987) however from various anthropological studies it was clear that there are many multifaceted aspects associated with the progress of technology. Analysis by Williams and Edge says that this opens up two schools of thought. First one was being how SST impacts the need for “negotiability”.
加拿大拉哇大学论文代写:技术的发展
Cronbergand another stream of questions are the irreversibility of the technical features on communal surroundings (Callon, 1993). There ideologies mentioned above prove that the questions were more in the scholastic dimension and the researches were debating over these issues from purely an academic standpoint using theoretical examples. A new dimension that was not considered prior to this was how policy changes were made as a result of the SST. Prior to the studies of SST it was perceived that product development and the advent of new technology arises from the knowledge garnered, speculation of the information and deriving of new ideas as a result. From these ideas products were developed. This represents a linear model. This model is criticized in SST. The innovation of technology depends on varied factors. The advent of technology in the new era is largely dependent on the social factors along with varied factors the traditional approaches of the applications of the linear models for expansion of technology is criticized. It is considered obsolete method and they should no longer be practiced. This is the opinion of the new generation of researchers and academicians (Fairclough, 1992). It was found that the constructive technology develops from the social aspects and not merely from an economic impact (Rip et al., 1995) other researchers say that they as active participants in policy making and aiding in developing of the technological framework argue that they also play a major role in the formation of technology.
