Abstract
This piece of research is exploratory in nature. Most research topics seek to answer a question. This one is different in that it seeks to come to an understanding of a system already in existence. Rather, more specifically it seeks to come to an understanding of two systems. This understanding is truly important for the future success of education. The insight and knowledge gained by this particular piece of research might very well change the way knowledge is imparted. It can come to change how we view the concept of education as individuals. It will bring to light how education is imparted to two different peoples, in two different cultures, indeed, in two different countries. This research seeks to develop a comparison. It seeks to understand how one system works and then compare it with another system. The issue this research addresses is to compare the typical classroom in China with the typical classroom in Canada.
The reason this research is so interesting and the reason I believe it will reveal so much is that China and Canada are poles apart. They are different in everything they do. Different in weather, food, language, tradition, culture, thought, morals, values and even outlook. So much of our outlook and thought processes are vested in the language we use. The language we use limits or liberates our thought with its structure and syntax. Thus fundamentally people who speak different languages think differently. Thus, this research will reveal which classroom is better, how the two are different, similar, and which is the more effective. As with every research question this question has guidelines to keep the researcher on track. There are several main questions which guide this research along. First, what does transformational leadership education look like? How is it in Canada and how is it in China? How is it different in the two countries? Two main issues we keep in mind throughout the research is teacher empowerment and leadership style.
抽象
这是探索性的研究。大多数的研究课题试图回答的问题。这一个是不同的，因为它的目的来已经存在的系统的理解。相反，更具体地说，它的目的来的两个系统的理解。这种认识是真正重要的是未来成功的教育。这个特殊的研究中获得的洞察力和知识，很可能改变了知识的传授。这样做可能会改变我们如何看待个人的教育理念。它会带来，点燃教育如何被赋予两个不同的民族，在两种不同的文化，事实上，在两个不同的国家。本研究旨在建立一个比较。它旨在了解一个系统如何工作的，然后它与其他系统进行比较。研究解决的问题，这在中国是比较典型的课堂，与传统的教室在加拿大。
这项研究的原因是这么有趣，这么多的原因，我相信它会显示的是，中国和加拿大是南辕北辙。在他们所做的一切，他们是不同的。不同的天气，食物，语言，传统，文化，思想，道德，价值观，甚至前景。因此，我们的视野和思维过程都掌握在我们使用的语言。我们使用的语言限制或我们的思想中解放出来，它的结构和语法。因此，从根本上谁的人讲不同的语言有不同的想法。因此，本研究将揭示教室是更好的，两个是不同的，类似的，这是更有效的。每一个研究问题，这个问题有指引，以保持研究员的轨道上。有几个主要的问题，指导研究沿。首先，变革型领导教育什么样子呢？它是如何在加拿大和在中国是怎么回事？它是如何在这两个国家有什么不同？我们牢记在整个研究的两个主要问题是教师专业自主权和领导风格。
