Explanation: By using the ethical mandates and natural sciences, it can allude that the climate variations in the past are based on the historical events and data that is collated. The natural sciences can be used as a tool to explain the climate change. This can be readily accepted by the terms of reason. It is for this reason that the impact of robust knowledge is taken. The perception would vary based on reason and faith ways of knowledge. Reason is used as a tool of decision-making. It arises from an unconscious level that depends on the previous experience that involves similar situations (Jasanoff 34). Some individuals decide as they have the intellectual enlightenment to achieve this paradigm. They are consciously aware of the choices that are made and the extent to which the determined choices prevail. On the other hand, certain individuals claim to understand the nuances of the situation based on faith. The ethical mandates that are involved in the claim to assert their actions are done. The role of the faith is not about the religious beliefs. Nevertheless, the tangible data is collated from the different sources across the world states that the climate change is real and brought on by global activity. It is the innate belief system that is found to exist in each. Doubting the data that is collated is also an integral aspect of faith. Owing to this, these two factors of reason and faith can be used to comprehend about climate change. This is the reason for this particular counterclaim to be weak.
Robust knowledge is shaped by the consensus and disagreements. It is important for the people to arrive at a consensus.
The areas of knowledge that were used in this particular schema were natural sciences and ethics.
The ways of knowing of acquiring this information were reason and faith.
The limitation of the claim regarding climate change is that there is more research which is needed to address the gaps in the information. Using these constraints as leverage, the people pretend to fill in the gaps of knowledge the people use faith to fill in the gaps.
Certain gaps and questions arise in the tangible proof to explain the radical changes in the atmosphere. It is for this reason that the fact of climate change not being real or that climate change is not brought on by human activity is just false or a weak claim.