代写论文：RN和EN之间的区别
其次，从法规的角度看待RN和EN之间的区别是非常重要的（Jacob等，2015）。来自法律要求的EN对其个人实践范围负责并承担责任。他们需要确保他们的个人能力存在。 EN必须遵守专业实践框架内的授权和监督原则。这属于澳大利亚护理和助产行为委员会，而且EN需要保护自己以及他们正在照顾的患者（Jacob，et al。，2012）。从2010年开始，国家注册在全国范围内实施，用于建立公共卫生专业人员的国家注册。自2010年以来，NMBA的目标仍然是让2008年之后毕业的ENs能够自动通过药物管理实践。这是因为毕业后相关学习单元的完成（Kartha等，2014）。 EN在护理环境中每次都与RN保持一致，并根据决策框架描述以人为本的护理服务。
代写论文：RN和EN之间的区别
这有赖于竞争力的基础（Lubbe和Roets，2014）。 EN需要在RN的直接或间接监督下工作，EN负责保留其个人行为的责任。根据患者的健康需求，按照所需的能力以及遵守雇主的政策和程序，他们还负责提供根据情况下受托的护理。正是这种关怀背景可以模糊不同医疗保健环境下的实践范围（Ruth，et al。，2013）。例如，EN可以扩大实践范围，并在适当的研究选修单元完成后导致IV的药物治疗。这里的其他条件是调整先决条件的组成部分，然后被认为是胜任的。但是，如果雇主管理政策和程序不允许EN管理IV的药物，那么EN有责任遵守通过雇主管辖的可行范围（Scanlon，et al。，2016） 。 ENs可扩展其实践范围的另一个例子是跨越区域，农村和偏远地区的环境，因为与大都市地区相比，劳动力的可用性和能力是可用的。
代写论文：RN和EN之间的区别
Secondly, it is crucial to look at the legal perspective that brings forward line of difference between RN and EN from regulations standpoint (Jacob, et al., 2015). The EN from legal requirement has accountability and responsibility for their individual practice scope. They need to make sure that their individual competence is present. ENs should adhere with the delegation and supervision principles set out within the framework of professional practice. This comes under the Board of Australia Nursing and Midwifery conduct and the ENs need to protect their selves as well as the patients who they are caring for (Jacob, et al., 2012). Registration nationally came under effect from 2010 for establishing a public health professional’s national registration. Since the year 2010, the goal of NMBA has remained on allowing ENs graduating after 2008 to be endorsed automatically for their medicinal administration practice. This is because of relevant study unit’s completion after graduation (Kartha, et al., 2014). The EN works in alignment with the RN at every time within the care context and depicts the competence within the person centred care delivery as per the framework of decision making.
代写论文：RN和EN之间的区别
This has its basis over competence (Lubbe and Roets, 2014). The EN is needed to work under the RNs direct or indirect supervision and the EN is responsible for retaining the responsibilities for their individual actions. They are also accountable to provide care which has been delegated as per the context, as per the patient’s health needs, as per the competencies needed and as per compliance with the policies and procedures of employers. It is the care context which then can blur the practice scope of difference across the varying environments of health care (Ruth, et al., 2013). An EN, for example, can expand the practice scope and result in administering the medication of IV after appropriate study elective unit has been completed by them. Other conditions here are aligning components of prerequisite nature and then being considered as competent for doing so. If the employers, however, governing the policies as well as procedures do not allow ENs to administer the medication of IV then it is the responsibility of the EN to abide within the practicable scope governed through the employer (Scanlon, et al., 2016). One more example where ENs can expand their practice scope would be across the environments of regional, rural and remote nature because of the availability of workforce as well as capacity in comparison to the area of metropolitan.
