代写论文：消费者保护
在ACL的第259条下，可能针对供应商或产品制造商采取行动和补救措施。如果没有满足保证，消费者可以对供应商采取行动。如果有机会进行补救并不是重大故障，那么消费者可以要求供应商进行补救。这必须在合理的时间内完成，因为人们可能期望一个合理的消费者和情况这样做。在哪里，供应商拒绝，然后消费者可以对供应商采取行动，以收回成本或失败。如果失败是一个重大的失败，那么消费者就可以拒绝商品的好处，采取行动，并从消费者的商品价值或价格的降低中获得补偿。消费者可以在这种情况下恢复损害赔偿，如果他们可以证明他们因为没有得到适当的良好供应而遭受了问题或损失。ACL的第260节定义了所谓的重大故障。
代写论文：消费者保护
在这种情况下，如果货物不被合理的消费者所购买，如果他们意识到货物的损坏程度，或者货物的质量不符合他们所购买的货物的目的，那么这种情况就不适用。对于理解重大故障的具体测试是合理的消费者测试s260(A)。合理的消费者测试是基于这样一种信念，即任何理性的消费者都必须意识到某些项目可能出现的失败形式。例如，一个消费者购买电视会认为，如果他们用正确的方式使用电视，那么多年以后，电视就不会出现故障。即使这个问题很小，也会被认为是一个重大的失败，因为它有理由认为它不会引起问题。在s260(c)和(d)项下，产品被认为不适合用于目的，如果在使用其确定的情况下，出现故障，使其无法在适当的时间内修复和恢复。
代写论文：消费者保护
Under section 259 of the ACL, action and remedies may be possible against the supplier or manufacturer of goods. A consumer is allowed to take action against the supplier if the guarantees are not met. Where there is a chance for the guarantee to be remedied and where it is not a major failure, then the consumer could request the supplier to remedy it. This has to be done within reasonable time, as one might expect a reasonable consumer and situation to do so. Where, the supplier refuses, then the consumer could take action against supplier in order to recover the costs or failure. Now in case the failure is a major failure, then the consumer could reject the good, take action and receive compensation in reduction of value of goods or price payable by consumer. The consumer can recover damages in such a situation, if they can show that they have suffered issues or losses on account of not having a proper good supplied to them. Section 260 of ACL defines for what is called a major failure.
代写论文：消费者保护
Major failure is applicable in such situation where the goods would not have been acquired by a reasonable consumer if they were aware of the extent of failure perceivable with the good or if the good is really not it for the purpose for which they have bought it. A specific test for understanding the major failure is that of the reasonable consumer test s260(a). The reasonable consumer test is based on the belief that any reasonable consumer must have been aware of the form of failure they could expect with some items. For instance, a consumer purchasing a television would consider that the television would work without failures for many years to come if they were to use it in the right way. A failure with respect to the television would be considered a major failure even if the issue was small because it was reasonable to expect that it would not cause an issue. Under s260(c) and (d), a product is considered unfit for purpose, if in the use of its ascertained situation, a failure occurs that makes it impossible to fix and recover it within good time.
