代写论文：风险管理
议员们的奉献精神目前集中在挪威和瑞典的风险问题上，这比他们在上世纪60年代最初的半年里所关注的要多三倍，这反映了他们提交的私人法案。由于意想不到的技术上的反对(McNeil et al .，2015)，在控制日益增长的相当情况下，有各种各样的尝试。Sowby(1965)断言，风险相关的比较是至关重要的。开车、吸烟和使用公共交通工具的风险比居住在核电站附近的风险要大得多。然而，这种方法在增加公众意愿、承认和接受技术风险方面并没有得到立即的注意。这并不是一个意外(Sargeant et al,2016)。
代写论文：风险管理
因此，我们对风险进行了全面的调查，并确定了社会对风险的接受程度，在某种程度上是与自1969年开始的福利和自愿行为有关。Starr的工作增加了风险管理的兴趣，并引起了公众对风险的感知、容忍和接受的兴趣(Wachinger et al .，2013)。对风险的感知被认为是对做出理性决策的挑战，因为公众在面对风险的时候，就像研究人员一样，没有风险。公众与专家感知风险之间的冲突，是基于对风险管理的社会困惑。与风险相关的感知的形成不能单独进行，既不能有效，也不能导致风险管理的成功。
代写论文：风险管理
The devotion of parliamentarians are presently focused on the issues related to risk in Norway and Sweden for about three times more than their focus in the initial half years of 1960s reflecting within the private bills that they submitted. There were various attempts made in controlling the considerable situation that was increasing growing because of the unexpected technological opposition (McNeil et al., 2015). It was then asserted by Sowby (1965) that risk related comparisons are essential to make. The risk of driving car, smoking and utilization of public transportation are highly greater than the risk associated with residing nearby a plant of nuclear power. However, this approach devised did not receive much immediate attention in increasing the public will, to acknowledge and accept risk of technology. This did not come as a surprise (Sargeant et al, 2016).
代写论文：风险管理
Therefore, risks were investigated comprehensively and identified that the societal acceptance to the risk was present to an extent that was its association with the benefits and voluntary as per Starr (1969). The work of Starr increased the interest within the management of risk and emergence of interest in determination of public perception, tolerance and acceptance of the risks (Wachinger et al., 2013). The perception of risk was then considered to be a challenge for making rational decisions as public viewed the risks in a situation where there were no presence of risks as per the concerning researchers. The conflict among the public and expert perception of risk is based on the social confusion of managing the risk. The formation of the perception in relation to a risk cannot work alone, neither it cannot be effective nor it can result into success for risk management.
