研究经济的社会学家试图关注中间阶层的现象。这些都是为分析资本主义的细微差别所做的努力。新一代的经济社会学家对政治很感兴趣政治是新时代国家奴隶制的一种形式。这些社会学家使用马克思主义社会学发展出来的细致入微的定义。此外，当代经济社会学家也对这些问题进行了探讨。大多数国家都接受了全球化。在中国和印度等国家，收入有了显著增长。一些国家已经拒绝了全球化，不可否认的是，他们正面临着一些金融危机。然而，同样微妙的资本主义造成了收入不平等。与此同时，人们发现，整个地区的人均收入都出现了显著增长。即使在最贫穷的人群中也可以观察到这一点(Giddens and Sutton, 2017)。这表明，在资本主义出现之前，穷人的生活要好一些。新兴国家的消费数据归因于该国存在的显著不平等。人们发现，人口中富人和穷人之间的差距在不同地区是截然不同的。全球化带来的好处惠及所有人。努力改革和加强教育。这是确保工人拥有适应全球经济的适当技能所必需的。有许多政策增加了穷人获得资金的机会。在这种模式下，不能说贸易自由化会促进农业出口(Buckmaster, 2009)。
The sociologists on the economy try to focus on the middle-range phenomena. These are few efforts that are made to analyse the nuances of capitalism. The newer economic sociologists are interested in the politics and the politics is a form of newer age slavery in the nations. These sociologists use the nuanced definition that is developed by Marxist sociology. Moreover, these are explored by the contemporary economic sociologists. Most of the countries have embraced globalization. There is a significant income increases in nations such as China and India. Some nations have rejected globalization and it cannot be refuted that they are facing some financial crisis. Nevertheless, the same nuanced capitalism has caused income inequality. At the same time, significant per capita incomes are found to have risen across the regions. This is observed even in the poorest segments of population (Giddens and Sutton, 2017). These indicate that the poor people were better before the advent of capitalism. The consumption data in the emerging nations attribute towards the striking inequality that exists in the nation. The divide between the rich and the poorest people in the population are found to be starkly different in the different regions. The gains from globalization are shared across the population. Efforts are made to reform and strengthen education. This is needed to ensure that the workers have appropriate skills for the global economy. There are many policies that increase the access of the finance to the poor. In this paradigm, it cannot be stated that the trade liberalization would boosts agricultural exports (Buckmaster, 2009).
To address these changes, it must be adequate income support to the cushion. The process of changes depends on the continued employment and it needs to be developed. These are equally important factors as it causes the people to be unemployed.
To understand the impacts of globalization, the question that should be discussed is the people who “lose” under globalization and the people who are likely to gain. In the current schema, according to the data, it is alluded that the people who are benefitted seem to be lesser than the people who lose form this paradigm. Based on the volume of data, it can be alluded that the globalization has brought in positive development. Nevertheless, these nations need to address some of the issues of globalization to help more people to be benefitted.
From the data and from observational analysis, it showed that capitalism, globalization and neo liberalization have all brought in positive development. However, the number of people being benefited is lesser than the number of people who are impacted. There is obvious limitation of this model that must be addressed. In addition, it cannot be refuted that this economic system is the most progressive and stable system when compared to the other economic policy of trade. These are the reasons for the people to critique the system and at the same time praise the policy of the globalization. According to this, the people who are impacted need to find ways to address certain issues in the policy.