澳洲essay代写：巴巴概念
巴巴的思想和作品改变了殖民主义的研究。这是因为与后结构主义相关的方法论在殖民主义文本中的应用。他考虑用“差异”一词来指代不同的写作作品。因此，他着重探索和延伸后结构主义对文化差异的意义。巴巴说，殖民统治高度依赖于对差异的断言。与殖民者相比，被殖民者的品质更差(巴巴，2010)。巴巴还认为，殖民当局承认，在被殖民的人民中，这种假定的差异与字面上的相似性正在被削弱。
巴巴进一步考察了国家的概念，对文化和文学研究留下了长期的影响。这是通过改进《民族与叙事》(1990)的选段来实现的。他的作品超越了历史话语的边界，超越了性别和种族的界限。这并不是为了形成一个普遍的理论，而是为了考虑在几个领域中困惑语言的生产性挑战(巴巴，1994)。有一种令人兴奋的理解，在交替的机会，有永久的不完整性和文化的过渡。巴巴的混杂与摹仿理论极大地改善了后殖民话语，其目的是指出借鉴。巴巴对混杂性概念的运用是近年来后殖民主义研究中最具争议和影响的一种(巴巴，2012)。
澳洲essay代写：巴巴概念
巴巴向法农作了一个倒退，提出了殖民主义条件下的混杂性和阈限性是关键属性。巴巴托放大了这一点，表明殖民主义的身份总是与痛苦和变化有关。这总是与地点有关，以确保正确表达殖民欲望。此外，还可以将刻板知识视为实际控制的来源。它也可以从殖民主义使命的哲学文明理由中分离出来(巴巴，2012)。每一种形式的群体认同都应被视为分化的来源，如实现交叉、多重反常和多形性。也有一些决定要求特别计算的效果。
澳洲essay代写：巴巴概念
The concepts and work of Bhabha transformed the research of colonialism. This is because of the application of methodologies related to post-structuralism in the texts of colonialism. He considered using the term “difference” referring to various writing pieces. Hence, he focused on exploring and extending the significant of post-structuralism for the difference of culture. It is stated by Bhabha that the dominating colonization is highly dependent on asserting the difference. The colonized have inferior qualities when compared to the colonizers (Bhabha, 2010). Bhabha also held the belief that it is acknowledged by colonial authority that there is undermining of this supposed difference from the literal similarity in colonized people.
Bhabha further investigated the concept of nation leaving a long term impact on cultural and literary studies. This was done by improving the excerpts of Nation and Narration (1990). His work was pushing across the borderline discourse of history, crossing the limits of gender and race. This was not for the purpose of formulating a general theory, but for considering the productive challenges of perplexed language in several areas (Bhabha, 1994). There is an exhilarated understand of alternate chances in which there is permanent incompleteness and transition of culture. The theories of hybridity and mimicry by Bhabha have strongly improved post-colonial discourse that it is used for the purpose of pointing out reference. Using the concept of hybridity by Bhabha was the most controversial and influential one since recent researches of post-colonialism (Bhabha, 2012).
澳洲essay代写：巴巴概念
Bhabha makes a backward leap to Fanon for suggesting that hybridity and liminality are crucial attributes in the condition of colonialism. This is amplified by Bhabhato to suggest that identities of colonialism are always in relation with agony and flux. This is always with respect to the location ensuring the correct articulation of colonial desire. In addition, there can be recognition of stereotypical knowledge as a source of practical control. It can also be separated out of philosophical civilized justification for the mission of colonialism (Bhabha, 2012). Each and every form of colonial identification has to be considered as source of differentiation, such as realizing cross-cutting, multiple perverse, and polymorphous. There are also determinations to demand specifically calculated effects.
