美国纽约论文代写：加拿大移民和难民保护法案
加拿大移民和难民保护法案(IRPA)构成了加拿大最重要的移民政策。根据2010年布拉格的估计,加拿大占9%移民进入国家难民身份。难民居住在加拿大是一个人道主义通道由联邦政府允许难民离开conflict-laden国家和迁移到加拿大(布拉格)。2008年的法案在下议院允许部长指令的移民官,此举大大影响了移民立法。还有方面包含的移民和难民保护法案的预算法案。部长级指令和预算法案带来了重要的移民政策的变化,这一次又一次地重组难民的状态。
美国纽约论文代写：加拿大移民和难民保护法案
加拿大的政治环境发生了一些变化时间的世界大战的进化动力学加拿大和其他国家之间的国际关系;移民立法已经一次又一次的修改。的政治动态也塑造了社会和加拿大人口的文化母体。过去,IRPA促进了对抗歧视但是最近的修改移民政策带来的扫描仪几个错误的原因。有担忧支持其演化的非渐进式的想法。此外,基本问题的基础上提出了指定某些国家和公民社会排斥的受害者,甚至种族灭绝种族战争和其他民族冲突。这些问题被带到公众视线的事实而一定人口可能容易受到这样的大规模恐怖国家指定的“不安全”,其他人群生活在一个看似“安全”的国家可能不是完全安全由于少数地位或有限表示由其他社区主导的国家。
美国纽约论文代写：加拿大移民和难民保护法案
The Canadian Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA) constitute the most important of the Canadian immigration policies. According to 2010 estimates of Bragg, Canada accounts for 9% immigrants that enter the country with a refugee status. The refugee diaspora in Canada is a humanitarian pathway created by the federal government to allow refugees to leave their conflict-laden countries and migrate to Canada (Bragg). The 2008 bill passed within the House of Commons allowed ‘Ministerial Instructions’ to immigration officers, a move that affected the immigration legislation significantly. There is also the aspect of the inclusion of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act in the budget bill. The ministerial instructions and the budget bill together have brought important changes in the immigration policy and this has restructured the status of refugees again and again.
美国纽约论文代写：加拿大移民和难民保护法案
The political milieu of Canada has undergone several changes from the time of world war and with the evolving dynamics of international relationships between Canada and other countries; the immigration legislation has been modified time and again. The political dynamics have also shaped the social and the cultural matrix of the Canadian population. In the past, the IRPA has facilitated the fight against discrimination however the recent modifications in the immigration policies have brought it under the scanner for several wrong reasons. There have been concerns over the non-progressive ideas that back its evolution. Moreover, fundamental concerns have been raised over the basis of designation of certain countries and citizens as victims of social exclusion, racial wars and other ethnic clashes or even genocide. These issues were brought to the public eye over the fact that while a certain population may be vulnerable to such mass terror in countries designated ‘unsafe’, other populations living in a seemingly ‘safe’ nation may not be entirely safe owing to their minority status or their limited representation in a country dominated by other communities.
