爱尔兰米斯论文怎么写：经济
尽管改革中引入中国常常被描述为以市场为导向的改革,只有少数严重正尝试将提供私人市场的重要特征或交付的系统维护私有财产的权利。同样的,在这方面也需要注意的是,独立的法院系统和商业法律几乎是不存在的。因此问题出现了中国如何成功地实现高经济表现没有上述因素视为基本实现世界其他地区的经济增长。这可以归因于事实上的联邦制或市场维护联邦制(王2001)。
爱尔兰米斯论文怎么写：经济
经济改革开始在1979年被引入中国。引入recentralization努力但之前,在邓小平的领导下中国领导人一直强调权威的代表团从中央政府到地方层面(2001年第3 p69)。在这方面政府间分散规定限制行动的各级政府尤其是支持实现显著的经济进步。在这方面,它已经被一些专家表示,分权导致限制了中央政府对经济的控制。与此同时,它还可以减少地方政府之间的竞争,同时它来约束自己的行为,同时为他们提供了一个广泛的积极的激励措施,非常有助于促进当地经济的繁荣(Zhiyue 2005 p166)。这样政府间权力下放有效地减少对经济的垄断控制由一个政府。
爱尔兰米斯论文怎么写：经济
Despite the fact that the reforms introduced in China are often described as market-oriented reforms, only a few serious attempts are being made to supply the vital features of private markets or to deliver a system of safeguarding the rights over private property. In the same way, it also needs to be noted in this regard that independent court system and commercial law are almost non-existent. Therefore the question arises how China has succeeded in achieving high economic performance without the above mentioned factors that are considered as essential for achieving economic growth in other parts of the world. This can be attributed to de facto federalism or the market preserving federalism (Wang, 2001).
爱尔兰米斯论文怎么写：经济
The economic reforms were starting to be introduced in China during 1979. Before the introduction of recentralization efforts made in1990s, Chinese leadership under Deng Xiaoping was constantly stressing upon the delegation of authority from the central government to the local level (Xuezhi, 2001 p69). In this regard the intergovernmental decentralization prescribed limits imposed on actions of government at all levels that was particularly in favour of achieving significant economic progress. In this regard, it has been stated by several experts that decentralization results in limiting the control of the central government over the economy. At the same time, it also reduces competition between the local governments and at the same time it serves to constrain their behaviour and at the same time provides them with a wide range of positive incentives that are very helpful in fostering the prosperity of local economy (Zhiyue, 2005 p166). In this way the intergovernmental decentralization effectively reduce the chances of having a monopolistic control on the economy by a single government.
