爱尔兰论文查重：谷歌公司的有效管理
Pitchai是谷歌公司的首席执行官，他把人们带出他们的舒适区，并促进创新。他一直被评论界高度赞扬，专注于形势的细微细节(Kinsley,and Clarke,2009)。在技术上，他也有管理和领导员工的强制性技能。有人说，Pitchai有助于形成公司整体愿景，并根据这些最终目标进行优先排序。人们发现，微观和宏观的因素都有全面的管理。这导致了公司的整体进步(Paz Rendal,2015)。与巴菲特类似，Pitchai也强调需要与员工保持有效的沟通(Paz Rendal,2015)。这是倾听员工的意见，并确保所有的利益相关者的需求和需求在这个过程中得到满足。他遵循了有效的压力管理政策。据观察，谷歌极具竞争力，需要在未来开创新的创新。对公司的表现有很多期望。他有管理压力的能力，或者至少在情况下保持管理压力的假象。
爱尔兰论文查重：谷歌公司的有效管理
Pitchai和巴菲特的另一个相似之处是，两位领导人都确保了他们的首要尊重和正直。对员工的诚信给予更多的关注，并确保在办公室环境中得到尊重。道德行为的重要性，保持透明度和促进创新是Pitchai被赞赏的因素(Paz Rendal,2015)。然而，对他的领导风格也有一些批评。两国领导人都确保提供适当的激励措施。奖励和识别是可量化和无形资产的组合。他们懂得人的重要性，他们被认为是社会上的优秀领导者。它也是自由放任式领导风格的支持者。在这种领导风格下，给员工更多的自由。在像谷歌这样的技术公司里，保持独裁和自治之间的平衡是很重要的。有一个很好的平衡需要满足(Paz Rendal,2015)。
爱尔兰论文查重：谷歌公司的有效管理
Pitchai is the CEO of Google INC. he is known to bring people out of their comfort zones and to foster innovation. He has been critically acclaimed to focus on the minute details of the situation (Kinsley, and Clarke, 2009).Being technically skilled he also has the mandated people skills to manage and lead employees. It has been said that Pitchai helps in formation of the overall vision of the company and prioritize based on these final objectives. It has been found that there is holistic management of the micro and the macroscopic factors. This has lead to the overall progress of the company (Paz Rendal, 2015).Similar to Buffet, Pitchai also emphasizes the need to maintain effective communication with the employees (Paz Rendal, 2015). This is listening to the views of the employees and ensuring that all the stakeholders’ needs and requirements are met in this process. He has followed effective stress management policy. It has been observed that Google is extremely competitive and needs to pioneer newer innovation in the future. There is a lot of expectations for the company to perform. He has the knack to manage stress or at least maintain the facade of managing stress in situations.
爱尔兰论文查重：谷歌公司的有效管理
Another common similarity between Pitchai and Buffet is that both of the leaders ensure that there is primary respect and integrity. There is more focus given on the employee’s integrity and ensuring that there is respect in the office environment. Importance of ethical conduct, maintaining transparency and fostering innovation are the factors for which Pitchai has been appreciated (Paz Rendal, 2015). However, there is some criticisms for his leadership style. Both the leaders ensure that the people are provided with the right incentives. Rewards and recognitions are a combination of quantifiable and intangible assets. They understand the importance of people and they are considered to be good leaders in the society. It is also a proponent of the laissez-faire leadership style. In this style of leadership more freedom is given to the employees. In a technological company such as Google it is important to maintain a balance between the autocracy and autonomy. There is a fine balance that needs to be met (Paz Rendal, 2015).
