爱尔兰劳斯论文怎么写：双重身份带来的影响
共同认同的结果,多数参与者和少数参与者被诱导表明学生的数量条件的具有双重身份的思想更。这是显而易见的,因为他们被随机分配到不同的组。采用的方法Banfield Dovidio(2013),它是发现参与者的数量报告的歧视对人少的总数相比,参与者在组织181年和176年。共同身份的平均评分多数参与者同意微妙的歧视可以说因为他们必须条件从心理上认识到人们根据他们的种族和生活的地方就像被一个美国或澳大利亚。这些身份观念也根深蒂固的参与者和他们做出相应的反应。大多数参与者的双重身份也同意多一点共同身份的参与者。这表明双重身份集团同意更多微妙的歧视事件中人们习惯于相信一个共同身份实践更占主导地位。这也表明,大多数参与者会感到微妙的事件对亚洲人的歧视,这些可以保持嵌入在早些时候的信仰,他们把它更严重的问题。
爱尔兰劳斯论文怎么写：双重身份带来的影响
双重身份的少数参与者集团最微妙的歧视人的协议,这可能意味着双重身份的人认为歧视是更严重的,如果是外的两种身份。这是明显的在中国,日本,印度,越南等,他们持有双重身份被自己用自己的人口和被别人或澳大利亚执行在他们身上是由于健康的交互和混合。按班菲尔德和Dovidio(2013)的研究中,参与者共同的身份是否会诱导,微妙的歧视识别水平会上升为少数参与者和多数参与者可能会下降。
爱尔兰劳斯论文怎么写：双重身份带来的影响
The result for the common identity, in which majority participants and minority participant are being induced indicates that the number of students with dual identity conditioned mind were more in the group. This is evident as they were randomly allocated to different groups. Adopting the method of Banfield and Dovidio’s (2013), it is seen that the number of participants who reported the subtle discrimination towards people were less in both when compared to the total number of participants in both the groups as 181 and 176. The mean score of common identity majority participants agreeing to the subtle discrimination can be said because they must be conditioned psychologically to recognise people according to their ethnicity and place of living like being an American or an Australian. These identity beliefs are also ingrained in participants and they react accordingly. The majority participants of dual identity also agreed a little more than the common identity participants. This indicates that the dual identity group which agreed more with subtle discrimination incidents among people would be conditioned to believe a common identity practice to be more dominant. This also indicates that majority participant would have felt incidents of subtle discrimination towards Asian people and these could be earlier beliefs that remain embedded in them, which they take it to be more serious matters of concerns.
爱尔兰劳斯论文怎么写：双重身份带来的影响
The minority participants in dual identity group have the least agreement of subtle discrimination towards people, and this could be mean that the dual identity people do consider the discrimination to be more serious if it is outside of the two identities they hold. This is evident in Chinese, Japanese, Indians, Vietnamese, etc. that they have holding dual identities by being themselves with their own population and being someone else or Australian which is enforced upon them due to healthier interactions and intermixing. As per Banfield and Dovidio’s (2013) study, if common identity would be induced on participants, the subtle discrimination recognition level would go up for minority participants and would probably go down for majority participants.
