爱尔兰动画学论文代写:生态系统
彼得·辛格的“所有动物都是平等的”,他认为每一个是平等和非人类最终将获得他们的权利。我们应该给予平等尊重动物给人类。然而,为了实现它,我们必须给每一个非人类平等的考虑。他相信,一旦我们考虑非人类同样,治疗和态度对他们我们会大大改变。他坚持认为,我们都是物种主义者和问题动物受苦的原因。我们对待他们的食物来源,也为目的的进行实验。人与动物最直接的方式是通过使用它们。人类喜欢把动物关在笼子里或细胞对他们的整个生命,而我们每天喂他们,照顾他们,这样我们可以利用他们拿走他们的皮肤或吃。他认为人们在参与实验停止消费,因为非人类生活的权利。因此,歌手认为动物被歧视的方式,我们必须停止这种治疗。在汤姆·里根的“动物权利”,他显示了subject-of-a-life的概念。他指出,人类和非人类道德上平等的,因为他们都是subject-of-a-life。意思subject-of-a-life,里根意味着这样的生物知识,他们是存在在这个世界上他们有情感,欲望,感觉等等。只要这些人符合这些要求,他们有权利和道德平等无论他们是人类或非人类。
爱尔兰动画学论文代写:生态系统
他认为动物的道德地位和国家道德行为和道德之间的差异。根据他的说法,道德代理人是那些有能力做正确的事情与道德,而道德患者没有能力做对或错的事情,他们不能控制他们在做什么。摘要罗尔斯顿,三世的“自然世界价值观和义务”,他指出,我们的社会应该non-anthropocentrism自然也有自己的内在价值。人类不应该对动物带来了太多的痛苦。我们有相同的方式对待动物我们希望被对待,尊重生态系统作为一个整体。人类的生活依赖于生态系统,然而,我们不应该过多干预生态系统。人类不应该跳过的性质和在非人类带来了太多的痛苦。
爱尔兰动画学论文代写:生态系统
In Peter Singer’s “All Animals are Equal”, he thinks that every being is equal and nonhumans in the end will gain their rights. We should give equal respect to animals as we give to humans. However, in order to realize it, we have to give equal considerations to every non-human. He believes that once we consider nonhumans equally, the treatment and attitudes we have toward them will change drastically. He maintains the view that we are all speciesists and question the reason why animals have to suffer. We treat them as a source of food and also for the purpose of conducting experiments. The most direct way in which people interact with animals is by consuming them. Humans prefer to keep animals in cages or cells for their entire life, while we feed them and take care of them everyday so that we can exploit them by either taking away their skins or eating them. He thinks that people have to stop consuming them and experimenting on them because nonhumans have the right to live their lives. Therefore, Singer thinks that animals are treated in a discriminating manner and we must stop this kind of treatment against them. In Tom Reagan’s “The case for Animals Rights”, he shows the concept of subject-of-a-life. He states that humans and nonhumans are morally equal because they both are subject-of-a-life. To mean by subject-of-a-life, Regan means that such beings have the knowledge that they are existent in this world and they have emotions, desires, sensations and so forth. As long as these beings comply with these requirements, they have the right and are morally equal no matter whether they are humans or nonhumans.
爱尔兰动画学论文代写:生态系统
He maintains the moral status of animals and states the differences between moral agents and moral patients. According to him, moral agents are those who have the ability to do right things with morality whereas the moral patients do not have the capacity to do right or wrong things and they cannot control what they are doing. In Holmes Rolston, III’s “Values In and Duties to the Natural World”, he points out that our view of the society should be non-anthropocentrism as nature too has its own intrinsic value. Human beings should not cause too many sufferings to animals. We have treat animals in the same manner we want ourselves to be treated so as to respect the ecosystem as a whole. Human’s life depend heavily on the ecosystem, however, we should not intervene too much in the ecosystem. Human should not skip the line of nature and cause too many sufferings on nonhumans.
